BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Two year-low!!

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:14 members

Two year-low!!

by gmat_perfect » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:31 am
According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(D) to a two-year low level
(E) to the lowest level in two years

Why are the wrong options wrong?

Please explain/
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:45 am
Is the OA D?
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:33 am
Thanked: 4 times

by anin » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:56 am
gmat_perfect wrote:According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years
(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate
(C) to what would be the lowest in two years
(D) to a two-year low level
(E) to the lowest level in two years

Why are the wrong options wrong?

Please explain/
'so that' is wrong. So that rules out A & B.
'to what' is awkward. So that rules out C
Between D & E - E sounds better because improvement is continuing.

So IMO its E.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
Thanked: 87 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by hardik.jadeja » Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:30 pm
The fight is only between D and E. Rest of the choices are unnecessarily wordy.

I pick E because in D, the phrase "two-year low level" looks unidiomatic and awkward.

Hope that helps..
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:50 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by muralithe1 » Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:57 pm
The answer is E..but not D...D changes the meaning of the sentence.


According to OG:

D could mean either that in July unemployment decreased to the lowest level in two years (which presumably is the intended meaning), or it could mean that in July unemployment decreased to a low level, where it will stay for two years.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:08 pm
STILL NOT SURE.... CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN.. WHY E IS BETTER THAN D
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pm
Thanked: 127 times
Followed by:14 members

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:44 am
Shawshank wrote:STILL NOT SURE.... CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN.. WHY E IS BETTER THAN D
Ron has explained the option D as follows:

The principal objection here is that the meaning is unclear: for instance, a 'two-year low level' could mean that it hit a low level and then stayed there for two years. I don't think it's 'unidiomatic' enough to kill it based on idiomatic usage alone; the ambiguity is the real problem.

My preferred wording for phrases like this is 'unemployment decreased ... to its lowest level in two years.' But, as usual, choices between 2 acceptable styles are matters of opinion.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1