BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Some insects

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 50 times
by akhpad » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:49 am
Some insects are able to feed on the leaves of milkweed, a toxic plant, by first cutting and draining the vein that secretes the toxin. This method of detoxification guarantees that some insects will always be able to eat milkweed, because the plant could never evolve to produce a toxin that is lethal in the trace amounts left after the vein is cut.

The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
A. The insects that successfully detoxify milkweed are not able to undergo the evolutionary changes necessary to allow them to detoxify other plants.
B. Unlike milkweed, other kinds of toxic plants would be able to overcome their vulnerabilities to predators through evolutionary changes.
C. The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can never evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through.
D. The method of detoxification used by insect predators of mildewed would not successfully detoxify other kinds of toxic plants.
E. There are insects that use means other than draining the toxin in order to feed on toxic plants.

OA: C

I am having trouble in understanding stimulus. So I could not find Assumption.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:06 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 14 times
GMAT Score:770

by prepgmat09 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:32 am
Premise : Some insects can feed on a toxic plant called milkweed by cutting and draining some part of the plant that is responsible for secreting the toxin. After the vein is cut and drained, the plant can never produce toxins.

Conclusion: As a result of this method of detoxication. some insects will always be able to eat milkweed.

A. All we know is about some insects that detoxify Milkweed. We do not know anything about detoxication of other plants by these insects. May be these insects are able to detoxify other plants as well. So, this is out.

B. Out of scope. All we know is about Milkweed. Other plants will be able to overcome vulnerabilities is too much to assume. So, this is out.

C. This appears to be a correct answer. If we negate the choice, it reads, "The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can sometimes evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through". Clearly, if this is true, the conclusion falls apart.
However, the only reservation I have with this answer choice is its language "....evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through". The argument talks about "some" insects. Here we are talking about insects in general. But I would keep this small reservation for second cut elimination if need be.

D. No information in argument assumes that the insects cannot use the same method on other plants.

E. May be. But no information in argument assumes that the insects use means other than draining the toxin.

So, IMO C.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 31 times

by paes » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:20 am
IMO C

good explanation above.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:07 pm
Hi Akhilesh, Could you pls quote the source of this qn?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 50 times

by akhpad » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:12 pm
paddle_sweep wrote:Hi Akhilesh, Could you pls quote the source of this qn?
Source: LSAT

I am solving those problems, which come under GMAT syllabus.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:15 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by dream700 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:10 pm
for me the catch was " some insects will always be able..... "

this shows that insects will always be feeding on such plants by the method of detoxification...and the plant won't eveolve to avoid that...

Deutsch750
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1