OG SC 24

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

OG SC 24

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:22 am
OG - SC - #24

Post subject: OG - SC - #24
Post Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:24 am


For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect

The answers is (C). I chose (E). Please help to understand why (C) is the correct answer.



StaceyKoprince
Post subject:
Post Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:07 am
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff

* User Control Panel
* Website



Posts: 5056
Location: San Francisco
We can't use an infinitive after the comma. Remember that an infinitive functions as a verb, but we're trying to introduce a modifying clause here to provide further information about the military equipment.

This is just one of those things you have to memorize, unfortunately, especially if you are not a native speaker.

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:27 am
The above thread has been copied from the thread @https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/og-sc-24-t582.html
There is a similar parallel thread active on BTG .I created this one to ask an expert for help
Cant the portion after the comma in (A) act as an appositive here ?
Can some one elaborate on what is meant when you say one cant use an infinitive after the comma .
I didnt understand either why we cant use an infinitive after the comma.
Thanks
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:02 am
@Mundasingh

Rule for COMMA + INFINITIVE

Do not place a comma before an adverbial infinitive at the end of the sentence.

Incorrect: You must pay a $500 deposit, to buy that car.

Correct: You must pay a $500 deposit to buy that car.

But in general also, as i have seen so far, in all the question COMMA + INFINITIVE is wrong.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:37 am
mundasingh123 wrote:OG - SC - #24

Post subject: OG - SC - #24
Post Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:24 am


For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect

The answers is (C). I chose (E). Please help to understand why (C) is the correct answer.



StaceyKoprince
Post subject:
Post Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:07 am
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff

* User Control Panel
* Website



Posts: 5056
Location: San Francisco
We can't use an infinitive after the comma. Remember that an infinitive functions as a verb, but we're trying to introduce a modifying clause here to provide further information about the military equipment.

This is just one of those things you have to memorize, unfortunately, especially if you are not a native speaker.

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT
An infinitive modifier can function as an adjective or as an adverb:

The surest way to ace the GMAT is to study hard. (The infinitive modifier to ace the GMAT is an adjective modifying the noun way.)

You are certain to ace the GMAT if you study hard. (The infinitive modifier to ace the GMAT is an adverb modifying the adjective certain.)

In answer choice E above, it is unclear what word is being modified by to protect. It must be clear what a modifier is modifying. Thus, E can be eliminated.

Answer choice C begins with the participle protecting. Unlike an infinitive, a participle cannot function as an adverb. When an -ing modifier begins a phrase, it functions as an adjective modifying the subject of the previous clause. Thus, it is clear that protecting is modifying shields. In fact, we could reverse the order:

Protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:13 pm
GmatGuru,
Thanks for clarifying my doubt and ill remember what you said about using the infinitive
Just 2 more questions
1)You said the -ing modifier modifies the subject of the previous clause.I remember reading somewhere that the the -ing modifier modifies the entire preceding clause.Can you just clarify whether there are exceptions to this rule so that we can take care while practicing Questions on Modifiers
2)You said that the -ing modifier cant function as an adverb .
What about the preopisition + gerund modifier
By taking the shorter route around the western coast of Ireland,Jim became the first child to cross the English Channel.
isnt the modifier preposition + gerund modifying the action "became "
the only difference here is the presence of the preposition before the gerund ie -ing.
Thanks GmatGuru
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:40 am
mundasingh123 wrote:GmatGuru,
Thanks for clarifying my doubt and ill remember what you said about using the infinitive
Just 2 more questions
1)You said the -ing modifier modifies the subject of the previous clause.I remember reading somewhere that the the -ing modifier modifies the entire preceding clause.Can you just clarify whether there are exceptions to this rule so that we can take care while practicing Questions on Modifiers
2)You said that the -ing modifier cant function as an adverb .
What about the preopisition + gerund modifier
By taking the shorter route around the western coast of Ireland,Jim became the first child to cross the English Channel.
isnt the modifier preposition + gerund modifying the action "became "
the only difference here is the presence of the preposition before the gerund ie -ing.
Thanks GmatGuru
Consider the following example:

John ate all the cookies, upsetting Mary.

It could be argued that upsetting Mary modifies the entire clause that precedes it (John ate all the cookies). What's important is that the subject of preceding clause -- John -- is performing the action of the -ing word: John is upsetting Mary. When you see the construction comma + VERBing, the subject of the preceding clause should be performing the action of the -ing word.

Please note that the comma makes all the difference:

John ate all the cookies upsetting Mary.

Without the comma preceding it, upsetting now modifies cookies. Whereas in the first sentence John is a cad (because he ate all the cookies, thereby upsetting Mary), in the second he's a hero (because he's getting rid of all those nasty cookies that for some reason are upsetting Mary.) The purpose of the comma in the first sentence is to make it clear that upsetting modifies not the noun right before it (cookies) but the subject of the preceding clause (John).

A preposition + gerund construction -- like any prepositional phrase -- can function as an adverb. An -ing word on its own, however, can function only as a noun or as an adjective.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:15 am
thanks gmatguru
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:25 am
GmatGuruNY ,
You said
A preposition + gerund construction -- like any prepositional phrase -- can function as an adverb.
do you mean a preposition + gerund construction with commas or without commas
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

• Page 1 of 1