GMAT Prep Question

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:29 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 26 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:700

by asamaverick » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:21 am
Each statement alone is not sufficient as it only gives the value of one variable only.

Considering both statements together.

x < 8/9
y < 1/8

You can add these two to get:
x + y < 8/9 + 1/8 = 73/72
So for certain values of x & y x + y can be greater than 1.

Consider x = 7/9 & y = 1/9. This satisfies both the criteria and the sum (8/9) is < 1.
If x = 63.5/72 & y = 8.5/72. This satisfies the criteria but the sum = 72/72 = 1.

Hence both together are not sufficient.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:7 members

by grockit_andrea » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:29 am
Neither statement 1 alone nor statement 2 alone is sufficient, because you need to know the values of both of those variables to answer the question. Now try putting them together. The first step is to give them a common denominator; we'll use 72. If x is less that 8/9, then it is less than 64/72. [8/9 * 8/8 = 64/72]. If x is less than 1/8, it's less than 9/72 [1/8 * 9/9 = 9/72]. If we add the maximum values for x and y together, we have 63/72 + 8/72 = 71/72, and that is indeed less than 1. However, try using 720 for your common denominator, instead of 72. Then your maximum x value is 639/720, and your maximum y value is 89/720. Add those together and you get 728/720, which is more than one. So even together, the inequalities presented for x and y aren't sufficient.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:37 am
Statement 1 is insufficient because it tells us nothing about y.

Statement 2 is insufficient because it tells us nothing about x.

Putting the two statements together, we have what I call a boundary question. In a boundary question, a value is given an upper or lower limit that it can't exceed. (Kind of like in Monopoly when you're told you can't pass "Go".) In this case, x and y are each given an upper limit: x < 8/9 and y < 1/8. A helpful technique for boundary questions:

Set the value equal to the boundary in order to see more clearly how the problem is restricted.

So let's say x = 8/9 and y = 1/8. Then x + y = 8/9 + 1/8 = 64/72 + 9/72 = 73/72.

This gives us the upper limit for x+y. Since x can't really equal 8/9 and y can't really equal 1/8, we know that x+y < 73/72.

This means that x+y can be ANYTHING smaller than 73/72:

If x+y = 1/72, is x+y < 1? Yes.
If x+y = 72/72 = 1, is x+y < 1? No.

Since the answer can be both yes and no, the two statements together are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:50 pm
Thanks guys for your prompt help :)
p.s. princeton review technique is most "leveragable"