Senator Lasker

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

Senator Lasker

by vikram4689 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:38 am
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers' retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

Please see DOUBT in spoiler before giving answers
[spoiler]Both B(passive) and E(active) are grammatically correct BUT shouldn't B(subjunctive) be used as meaning of sentence shows command[/spoiler]
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

by vk_vinayak » Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:52 am
IMO E.

Here there are two command words:propose and require.

I had read that 'propose' always takes the subjunctive form. But one of the important structures of subjunctive form is that the command word is followed by 'that'. But here that is not the case.

'Require' can be used in either subjunctive form or non-subjunctive form. Here non-subjunctive one is used.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:15 am
'Require' can be used in either subjunctive form or non-subjunctive form. BUT the meaning conveyed shows ORDER so shouldn't we used SUBJUNCTIVE
e.g.
a) my team requires me to complete the project ... no command, so no subjunctive
b) legislation require that citizens switch off lights during blackout in war ... ORDER, so subjunctive ONLY


Open to discussion
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

Legendary Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:53 am
Thanked: 52 times
Followed by:5 members

by killer1387 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:16 am
Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers' retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

E is active and is correct subjunctive use. In B the use of words "by employers" renders it wrong. The emphasis is on Employers and hence E is correct.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:11 am
vikram4689 wrote:Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers' retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers

Please see DOUBT in spoiler before giving answers
[spoiler]Both B(passive) and E(active) are grammatically correct BUT shouldn't B(subjunctive) be used as meaning of sentence shows command[/spoiler]
B) ...legislation requiring that all older workers...show just cause for dismissal.
The implication here is that OLDER WORKERS are responsible for the dismissals and that they should be required to SHOW JUST CAUSE.
The intended meaning is that the EMPLOYERS are responsible for the dismissals.
Since B does not convey the intended meaning, eliminate B.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:33 am
B) ...legislation requiring that all older workers be...
This wording implies that ALL OLDER WORKERS are required to BE something. Not so: the legislation is directed not at older workers but at EMPLOYERS.

Does this mean that B is grammatically incorrect ?, in my view B is not wrong but uses passive voice

Please see similar ques where Stuart mentions that "When someone or thing is actually doing the requiring, we use the subjunctive tense "
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:51 am
vikram4689 wrote:
Does this mean that B is grammatically incorrect ?, in my view B is not wrong but uses passive voice

Please see similar ques where Stuart mentions that "When someone or thing is actually doing the requiring, we use the subjunctive tense "
The primary issue here is MEANING.
Please see my amended response above, in which I've fleshed out the reasoning.
Since this SC is from the OG11, the idiom requiring X to Y is an acceptable idiom on the GMAT.

Also:
Whereas the verbs in E -- to retain and [to] show -- are both active and thus parallel, the verbs in B -- be retained (passive) and show (active) -- are not.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

• Page 1 of 1