BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Surrealist

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Surrealist

by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:06 pm
Surrealist: Many artists mistakenly think that models need be taken only from outside the psyche. Although human sensibility can confer beauty upon even the most vulgar external objects, using the power of artistic representation solely to preserve and reinforce objects that would exist even without artists is an ironic waste.

A- An artist's work should not merely represent objects from outside the psyche.
B- Artistic representation is used solely to preserve and reinforce objects.
C- Artists should not base all their work on mere representation.
D- Great art can confer beauty even upon very vulgar external objects.
E- True works of art rarely represent objects from outside the psyche.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the surrealist's argument? Any experts advice?

OA A
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2898
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:49 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:5 members

by Vincen » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:21 pm
I thought that the correct option was C. Why is A?
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 1:02 am
Location: Global
Thanked: 32 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:770

Fix

by elias.latour.apex » Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:26 am
This is Q. 12 from the Manhattan LSAT Prep Test 32. I did not originally answer this question because I think that LSAT questions generally shouldn't be used in GMAT prep. I don't know of any GMAT question that asks someone to identify the conclusion of an argument.

However, since you asked, I will delve into finding the conclusion of an argument. Generally speaking, the conclusion will:

1. Be accompanied by indicator words such as therefore, thus, hence, clearly, etc.
2. Include modal verbs such as must, should, would, will, etc.
3. Express an opinion or a claim rather than a fact.
4. Contain some form of the verb to be.
5. Be supported by other portions of the text (the why? test).

Based on these criteria, we can see that the top candidate for the conclusion is:

...using the power of artistic representation solely to preserve and reinforce objects that would exist even without artists is an ironic waste.

It contains a modal verb.
It expresses an opinion.
It contains the word is, a form of the verb to be.

However, it fails the why? test. There are no other portions of the argument that support this choice.

In reality, the conclusion of this argument is contained in the first sentence, but it must be completely rephrased to make it into a recognizable conclusion. The key word is mistakenly. When the argument says "Many artists mistakenly think that models need be taken only from outside the psyche" we can rephrase this as: It is a mistake to think that models need be taken only from outside the psyche. This is nicely summed up by answer choice (A).

However, I still think that this problem is far too subtle and difficult to be a good representation of a typical GMAT problem. Two-thirds of GMAT problems are strengthen, weaken, and assumption questions. Until a student has mastered those three types, it is generally a waste of time to delve into the more difficult question types.
Last edited by elias.latour.apex on Mon Jan 08, 2018 7:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Top
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:44 pm
Vincen wrote:I thought that the correct option was C. Why is A?
I am quite confused about this also, can some experts help?
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1