Food scarcity

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 221
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times

Food scarcity

by mgmt_gmat » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:12 am
Which of the following most logically completes the reasoning?

Either food scarcity or excessive hunting can threaten a population of animals. If the
group faces food scarcity, individuals in the group will reach reproductive maturity later
than otherwise. If the group faces excessive hunting, individuals that reach reproductive
maturity earlier will come to predominate. Therefore, it should be possible to determine
whether prehistoric mastodons became extinct because of food scarcity or human hunting,
since there are fossilized mastodon remains from both before and after mastodon
populations declined, and ______.

A. there are more fossilized mastodon remains from the period before mastodon
populations began to decline than from after that period
B. the average age at which mastodons from a given period reached reproductive
maturity can be established from their fossilized remains
C. it can be accurately estimated from fossilized remains when mastodons became
extinct
D. it is not known when humans first began hunting mastodons
E. climate changes may have gradually reduced the food available to mastodons
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:31 am
mgmt_gmat wrote:Which of the following most logically completes the reasoning?

Either food scarcity or excessive hunting can threaten a population of animals. If the
group faces food scarcity, individuals in the group will reach reproductive maturity later
than otherwise. If the group faces excessive hunting, individuals that reach reproductive
maturity earlier will come to predominate. Therefore, it should be possible to determine
whether prehistoric mastodons became extinct because of food scarcity or human hunting,
since there are fossilized mastodon remains from both before and after mastodon
populations declined, and ______.

A. there are more fossilized mastodon remains from the period before mastodon
populations began to decline than from after that period
B. the average age at which mastodons from a given period reached reproductive
maturity can be established from their fossilized remains
C. it can be accurately estimated from fossilized remains when mastodons became
extinct
D. it is not known when humans first began hunting mastodons
E. climate changes may have gradually reduced the food available to mastodons
MY PICK IS B

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:39 am
IMO : B

Argument is all about "reproductivity". Unless Fossils give us that info, we cannot argue the cause of extinction.
I am on a break !!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:13 am
I would choose B

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:41 am
You need two things to calculate age when mastodons became extinct.

1. Mastodon fossile remains (Given in the passage) and
2. Average age when they reach reproductive maturity

You don't care when human started hunting first time or when food scarcity started.
mgmt_gmat wrote:Which of the following most logically completes the reasoning?

Either food scarcity or excessive hunting can threaten a population of animals. If the
group faces food scarcity, individuals in the group will reach reproductive maturity later
than otherwise. If the group faces excessive hunting, individuals that reach reproductive
maturity earlier will come to predominate. Therefore, it should be possible to determine
whether prehistoric mastodons became extinct because of food scarcity or human hunting,
since there are fossilized mastodon remains from both before and after mastodon
populations declined, and ______.

A. there are more fossilized mastodon remains from the period before mastodon
populations began to decline than from after that period - though more fossilized mastodon remains are available how are they helpful for the analysis. Incorrect
B. the average age at which mastodons from a given period reached reproductive
maturity can be established from their fossilized remains - Yes, if we know this then we can easily come to know when actually mastodons become extinct. If the age is less than average then mastodons become extince because of hunting and if the age is more than average then mastodons become extince because of scarcity of food
C. it can be accurately estimated from fossilized remains when mastodons became
extinct - this is extreme, one part says it should be and option says accurately estimated.
D. it is not known when humans first began hunting mastodons - irrelevent
E. climate changes may have gradually reduced the food available to mastodons - this is also irrelevent
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)