BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

good weaken agrument question

Expert replies
by kartik1979 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:23 am
Astronomers have created a mathematical model for
determining whether life exists outside our solar
system. It is based on the assumption that life as we
know it can exist only on a planet such as our own,
and that our sun, which has nine planets circling it,
is the kind of star commonly found throughout the
universe. Hence it is projected that there are billions
of planets with conditions similar to our own. So
astronomers have concluded that it is highly probable,
if not virtually certain, that life exists outside
our solar system. Yet there has never been detected
so much as one planet beyond our solar system.
Hence life exists only on planet Earth.
Which one of the following would most weaken the
above argument?
(A) Thousands of responsible people, people with
reputations in the community to protect, have
claimed to have seen UFOs. Statistically, it is
virtually impossible for this many people to
be mistaken or to be lying.
(B) Recently it has been discovered that Mars has
water, and its equatorial region has temperatures
in the same range as that of northern
Europe. So there may be life on Mars.
(C) Only one percent of the stars in the universe
are like our sun.
(D) The technology needed to detect planets outside
our solar system has not yet been
developed.
(E) Even if all the elements for life as we know it
are present, the probability that life would
spontaneously generate is infinitesimal.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:40 am
B?

A. out of scope. we are talking of life. the choice talks of UFO

B. correct. shows that mars is similar to earth, life may exist on mars

C. talks only about the sun, not about the planets. doesnt weaken that life exists only on earth

D. out of scope

E. streghthens.
Join the discussion

by kartik1979 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:46 am
I also choose B as answer but OA - D
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:15 am
looks like we both fell in the trap:) D does makes sense

the stimulus says "Yet there has never been detected
so much as one planet beyond our solar system and concludes that life exists only on planet Earth"

=> no life therefore not detected

D says: no technology developed, therefore not detected. it gives an alternative explanation for why no life has been detected. so its not neccessarily true that there is no life.

our B is out of scope after all. the stimulus is about whether life exists outside the solar system. mars is within the solar system. so out of scope.
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:42 am
well analysed scoobydooby
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:00 pm
I must admit that D seems to be the answer. What's OA?
Join the discussion