air travel

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

air travel

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:46 am
6. Air travel is becoming increasingly more
dangerous. In the last year there have been
seven major collisions resulting in over 700
deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.
Which statement, if true, would most weaken
the argument above?
(A) Since the volume of air traffic has been
increasing all the time, an increase in the
number of deaths due to collisions does
not necessarily mean greater danger.
(B) The increase in collisions can be explained
by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and
unusual weather.
(C) Mortality per passenger mile is lower for
air travel than for any kind of surface
transportation.
(D) The increase in deaths due to collision in
air travel has proceeded at a rate identical
to that for deaths in all other major forms
of transportation.
(E) Last year the average number of
passengers per flown plane was
significantly lower than that of previous year
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:18 pm
GMAT Score:720

Re: air travel

by sg1928 » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:14 am
delhiboy1979 wrote:6. Air travel is becoming increasingly more
dangerous. In the last year there have been
seven major collisions resulting in over 700
deaths, more deaths than in any previous year.
Which statement, if true, would most weaken
the argument above?
(A) Since the volume of air traffic has been
increasing all the time, an increase in the
number of deaths due to collisions does
not necessarily mean greater danger.
(B) The increase in collisions can be explained
by statistical coincidence, hijackings, and
unusual weather.
(C) Mortality per passenger mile is lower for
air travel than for any kind of surface
transportation.
(D) The increase in deaths due to collision in
air travel has proceeded at a rate identical
to that for deaths in all other major forms
of transportation.
(E) Last year the average number of
passengers per flown plane was
significantly lower than that of previous year
Hmm....I will go with 'B'. B lists the unusual circumstances with led to high number. There is no guarantee that in future years too, we have the same situation. Hence we can't conclude that air travel is becoming dangerous.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:47 am
Between A and D.

A is better choice. D is out of scopr as we are not discussing the other modes of transportation.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 am
I chose C when I attempted the question. Can someone elaborate on why C cannot be the correct answer.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:45 am
this passage connects an increased NUMBER of fatalities with a contention that air travel is MORE LIKELY to cause fatalities (i.e., that air travel causes a higher RATE / FREQUENCY of injuries).

if you've done enough critical reasoning, then you should know that this sort of correction - between ABSOLUTE NUMBERS and RATES / PROPORTIONS - is seriously flawed, because it assumes that the underlying totals match.
for example, if more high school seniors graduate this year, that doesn't necessarily imply a higher graduation rate; instead, it could simply be the case that there are more seniors to start with, with the same graduation rate (or even a lower rate) than before.

--

to undermine the conclusion of this passage, we should find something that destroys the connection between absolute numbers and percentages. this can be done in one of two ways:
* we could have a statement showing that MORE PASSENGERS are flying than before.
* we could have a statement showing that passengers are flying MORE OFTEN than before.

(a), which posits the former of these, is the correct answer.

(b) doesn't weaken the statement, because danger arising from hijackings and bad weather is still danger.

(c) and (d) are completely irrelevant, because the passage is arguing only that air travel is more dangerous than it used to be. any comparisons to other forms of travel are completely outside bailiwick of the argument.

if anything, (e) actually strengthens the argument, because a decrease in the number of passengers would, all other things equal, decrease the number of fatalities. if the # of fatalities has still increased despite a drop in passengers per plane, then that's ... bad (unless there are WAY more planes than before ... but that's choice (a) ).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:27 am
thanks guys, I get it now. The OA is A.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 11:01 pm
I believe the answer should be A