BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is C better than E

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:17 am
Thanked: 1 times
by kartik1979 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:05 am
Over his 65-year life span, Hughes, one of America’s most enduring writers and a key figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920’s, will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.

A. will have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
B. is publishing hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
C. would have published hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
D. will publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
E. would publish hundreds of poems, plus novels, short stories, autobiographies, librettos, essays and children’s books.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by chetanojha » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:41 am
I think Its C.

"Would have published" makes sense than "would published".
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:12 am
"Over his 65-year life span" in the original sentence means that Hughes is no more. so all the publishing has been completed.

C: "would have published"=>(presumably) must have published the "would' is used for uncertainty/speculation about the number of articles published.

E: the "would" simply takes it to the future tense- it seems as though Hughes who is not alive, will publish in the future. E is incorrect therefore.

hence, C is much better than E

the other choices are equally bad.
A: uses future perfect tense-not logical
B: uses present continuous- for a dead person!
D: simple future for a dead person.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:17 am
Thanked: 1 times

OA

by kartik1979 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:02 am
OA - E

I went for C as ans with same logic that u stated

Explaination given for Ans

The best answer is E. Choices A, B and D use tenses that can only be used for the living. Hughes, the subject of the sentence, is deceased, as is evidenced by the sentence. Choice C sets up a condition would have published... but the condition is then not specified.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:41 am
wow, would never have got that. is it a retired gmat q?

i thought for conditionals with "if" we had a structure:
if x happened, y would have happened. but didnt know if that was the only way in which "would have" is used.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pmFollowed by: 17 members
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:46 am
The best answer is E. Choices A, B and D use tenses that can only be used for the living. Hughes, the subject of the sentence, is deceased, as is evidenced by the sentence. Choice C sets up a condition would have published... but the condition is then not specified.

Why is E the answer??
Because no other answer qualifies or its simply the perfect answer??
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by nasa » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:20 pm
"would" is past tense for "will"

When we were in college, we would meet our English professor daily.

In a similar tone, E is correct.

"would have" is used to express probability or presumption in present or past time.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:02 am
Location: Azerbaijan/Baku
Thanked: 2 times

by S0laris » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:40 pm
scoobydooby wrote:wow, would never have got that. is it a retired gmat q?

i thought for conditionals with "if" we had a structure:
if x happened, y would have happened. but didnt know if that was the only way in which "would have" is used.
If she wins……she will gave…...
If she won…… she would/could give……
If she had won……she would/could have given……
we are the champions !
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1