BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

700+ The media often hastens to chastise celebrities

Expert replies
by challenger63 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:29 pm
The media often hastens to chastise celebrities who have come into sudden and unexpected prominence, whether they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation.

A. they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation
B. their vocation be acting, music performance, or some other high-profile vocation
C. they be actors, music, or some other high-profile vocation
D. their vocation is that of actor, musician, or otherwise a high-profile one
E. they are actors, are musicians, or in some other high-profile vocation

Source: 800Score
OA after discussion
If you find my post useful, please don't hesitate to click thanks button.


I am not an expert, so I can make mistakes. If you see a mistake, please notify me.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hemant_rajput » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:39 am
The media often hastens to chastise celebrities who have come into sudden and unexpected prominence, whether they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation.

A. they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation
>> I feel it should be "they are"
B. their vocation be acting, music performance, or some other high-profile vocation
>> I'm having my doubts with this one. Sentence is using vocation two time in the sentence. This is the only reason I'm eliminating this option.
C. they be actors, music, or some other high-profile vocation
>> it should be musician.
D. their vocation is that of actor, musician, or otherwise a high-profile one
>> looks good to me.
E. they are actors, are musicians, or in some other high-profile vocation
>> parallelism error.
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by vishalbpr » Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:17 am
challenger63 wrote:The media often hastens to chastise celebrities who have come into sudden and unexpected prominence, whether they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation.

A. they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation
B. their vocation be acting, music performance, or some other high-profile vocation
C. they be actors, music, or some other high-profile vocation
D. their vocation is that of actor, musician, or otherwise a high-profile one
E. they are actors, are musicians, or in some other high-profile vocation

Source: 800Score
OA after discussion
A. they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation
-> two different kind of nouns are compared.
B. their vocation be acting, music performance, or some other high-profile vocation
-> I think, this is correct.
C. they be actors, music, or some other high-profile vocation
-> Not related words. actors and music.
D. their vocation is that of actor, musician, or otherwise a high-profile one
-> Not parallel - sud be that of actor, musician or otherwise high-profile one
E. they are actors, are musicians, or in some other high-profile vocation
- Not Parallel.
Join the discussion

by insanejuxtapose » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:55 am
A. they be actors, musicians, or some other high-profile vocation - parallelism error:
B. their vocation be acting, music performance, or some other high-profile vocation - No error,
C. they be actors, music, or some other high-profile vocation - parallelism error
D. their vocation is that of actor, musician, or otherwise a high-profile one - changes meaning, "otherwise a high profile one" is different from "other high profile one"
E. they are actors, are musicians, or in some other high-profile vocation - parallelism error

Would go with B, even though it repeats the word 'vocation', not a strong enough reason to eliminate it unless it changes the meaning. Looking forward to the OA.
Join the discussion