BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SC-89 from OG 12

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Kasia@EconomistGMAT » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:38 pm
@kshism
Could you write again which answer seems better than the OA in your opinion?
Kasia
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT - the #1 rated GMAT course

"¢ If you found my post helpful, please click the "thank" button and/or follow me.

"¢ Take a 7 day free trial and find out why Economist GMAT is the highest rated GMAT course - https://gmat.economist.com/

"¢ Read GMAT Economist reviews - https://reviews.beatthegmat.com/economis ... mat-course
Join the discussion

by kshism » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:50 pm
its hidden, plz highlight the text by selecting it.
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:54 pm
D seems to compare:

a) How much it costs to maintain dirt roads with
b) How much paved roads cost

So, D is not comparing the maintenance costs of the two types of roads. Would have been better if D had been:

maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as it does for maintaing paved roads

Not that this is an ideal sentence, but at least the comparison is logical.

If this is still not clear, you might want to google, am sure this example has beaten to death multiple times: ).
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:09 am
Dirt roads may evoke the bucolic simplicity of another century, but financially strained township point out that dirt roads cost twice as much maintaining paved roads.

A.
B. dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads do
C. maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as paved roads do
d. maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as it does for paved roads
e. to maintain dirt roads costs twice as much as for paved roads

Why can't D be correct?
In D, it seems to refer to the entire phrase MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS.
Does is standing in for costs.
Thus, the implied meaning makes no sense: MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs twice as much as MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs for PAVED ROADS.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:12 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Dirt roads may evoke the bucolic simplicity of another century, but financially strained township point out that dirt roads cost twice as much maintaining paved roads.

A.
B. dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads do
C. maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as paved roads do
d. maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as it does for paved roads
e. to maintain dirt roads costs twice as much as for paved roads

Why can't D be correct?
In D, it seems to refer to the entire phrase MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS.
Does is standing in for costs.
Thus, the implied meaning makes no sense: MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs twice as much as MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs for PAVED ROADS.
GMATGuruNY - a quick clarification needed.

The ABOVE is TRUE because the referent of a SUBJECT PRONOUN (such as IT) MUST be the NOUN Subject in the preceding clause + any attached Modifier to that NOUN Subject.

Am I correct or there is any other possible interpretation to this issue ?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:38 am
RBBmba@2014 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:d. maintaining dirt roads costs twice as much as it does for paved roads

In D, it seems to refer to the entire phrase MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS.
Does is standing in for costs.
Thus, the implied meaning makes no sense: MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs twice as much as MAINTAINING DIRT ROADS costs for PAVED ROADS.
GMATGuruNY - a quick clarification needed.

The ABOVE is TRUE because the referent of a SUBJECT PRONOUN (such as IT) MUST be the NOUN Subject in the preceding clause + any attached Modifier to that NOUN Subject.
In D, dirt roads serves not as a modifier but as the DIRECT OBJECT of maintaining.
That said, similar reasoning applies:
The subject pronoun in the second clause (it) must serve to refer not only to the preceding subject (maintaining) but also to the attached direct object (dirt roads).
Thus
it = maintaining dirt roads.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by sagarock » Wed Sep 14, 2016 7:45 am
Hii mitch sir,kindly elaborate on this construction 'as much to maintain as' with examples .iam finding difficult to come in terms with it
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:14 am
sagarock wrote:Hii mitch sir,kindly elaborate on this construction 'as much to maintain as' with examples .iam finding difficult to come in terms with it
Generally, an infinitive modifier serves to express INTENT or PURPOSE.
An OA in GMATPrep:
Frogs take three years to reach adulthood.
Question: WHY do frogs take three years?
Answer: They take three years TO REACH ADULTHOOD.

OA: Dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads do.
Here, as much as serves to compare the cost of dirt roads to the cost of paved roads, as follows:
Dirt roads cost twice as much as paved roads.
The purpose of to maintain is to express WHY dirt roads cost twice as much.
Question: WHY do dirt roads cost twice as much?
Answer: They cost twice as much TO MAINTAIN.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1