BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep SC

Expert replies
by sparsh.21 » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:40 pm
By pressing a tiny amount of nitrogen between 2 diamonds to a pressure of 25 million pounds per square inch, scientists not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created a semiconductor similar to silicon

a. not only were able to transform the gas into a solid, but they also created

b. not only were able to transform the gas into a solid but also creating

c. were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but to create

d. were able not only to transform the gas into a solid but also creating

e. were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create

I found this question on another forum... OA given is
C but IMO its E please explain the answer
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by pbanavara » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:18 pm
Where did you see this posted ? The OA can't be C E seems right

- pradeep
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)
Join the discussion

by sparsh.21 » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:46 pm
its in testmagic.....
the question is from gmat prep
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:53 pm
As per latest MGMAT Page 198
Not Also ... But ... construction
is used by GMAT in correct answer choice.
I was looking for an example, now have one.
More over you look into the choices only 'C' maintains parallelism.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 pm
were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create

Two red parts are not parallel. Here is the question:

How would you fix E ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by sparsh.21 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:29 am
because that was the only option i thought was best amoung all.... i never knew about the construction "Not only....but" is also correct on GMAT.
Join the discussion

by welcome » Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:28 am
IMO elimination of E is based on wordyness instead of parallalism.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:07 am
logitech wrote:were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but they were also able to create

Two red parts are not parallel. Here is the question:

How would you fix E ?
I suppose by removing they in the second clause.

were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but were also able to create
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:11 am
amitabhprasad wrote:As per latest MGMAT Page 198
Not Also ... But ... construction
is used by GMAT in correct answer choice.
I was looking for an example, now have one.
More over you look into the choices only 'C' maintains parallelism.
I agree , not also ... but .. is a valid construction but here's my problem with C

"were able not only to transform the gas" - Shouldn't 'able' be immediately followed by the infinitive ?

- pradeep
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)
Join the discussion

by vscid » Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:19 am
amitabhprasad wrote:As per latest MGMAT Page 198
Not Also ... But ... construction
is used by GMAT in correct answer choice.
I was looking for an example, now have one.
More over you look into the choices only 'C' maintains parallelism.
Which book are you specifically talking about ?
I never knew about this 'not only...but' business.
grrrr :evil:
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.
Join the discussion

by aroon7 » Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:54 pm
even latest kaplan book says Not only... but is ok
pl see page 143 in that book

i duno hw many exceptions are there in the idioms we learn :evil:
--------------------------
i am back!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1