time, distance, velocity q

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:40 am
Location: Canada
Thanked: 4 times

by rajmirra » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:43 pm
Hey the answer is 20. Even I thought its 25 but after seeing your answer I got the logic.

Cyclist's speed is 20 miles/60 mins which is 1/3 miles per minute

Hiker's speed is 4 miles/60 mins which is 1/15 miles per minute

In 5 mins Cyclist would go 5/3 miles

In the same 5 mins hiker would go 1/3 miles.

So the cyclist has to wait for the hiker until he covers 5/3 minus 1/3 miles which is 4/3 miles. With a speed of 1/15 mile per minute the hiker would cover the distance 4/3 in 20 minutes.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by sibbineni » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:40 pm
yes Ans is 20

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:23 pm
There are two variations of this question:

First, we have two objects that are travelling in opposite (i.e. directly towards each other or directly away from each other). If we want to calculate relative velocities, we ADD their individual speeds.

Second, we have two objects travelling in the same direction (usually a catch-up question, like the one you posted). If we want to calculate relative velocities, we SUBTRACT one speed from the other.

So, in this example, the cyclist gains (20) - (4) = 16mph

5 minutes is 1/12th of an hour, so in the 5 minutes of travel the cyclist travels an extra 1/12(16) = 16/12 = 4/3 of a mile.

At a rate of 4mph, it takes (4/3)/(4) hours (4/3)(1/4) = 1/3 of an hour (or 20 minutes) to catch up.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course