I think the assumption is all those who signed are part of student coalition group.
If that assumption is negated then the flaw gets revealed which choice E does IMO
Some of the people who signed may not be part of student coalition.the flaw that all member signed and philip signed therefroe philip is a member logical deduction is weakened.
Regards,
CR
Student Rights Coalition
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
- Vemuri
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 am
- Thanked: 32 times
- Followed by:1 members
Cool explanation Cramya. Where have you been?cramya wrote:I think the assumption is all those who signed are part of student coalition group.
If that assumption is negated then the flaw gets revealed which choice E does IMO
Some of the people who signed may not be part of student coalition.the flaw that all member signed and philip signed therefroe philip is a member logical deduction is weakened.
Regards,
CR
-
anshulseth
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:41 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:2 members
It falls under the category of "Alternatives" for CR, going by Kaplan 800, segregation for CR topics.
Right answer is thus E.
Right answer is thus E.
Asset
-
delhiboy1979
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am
Why is C incorrect, it is possible that Philip resigned after signing the petition so he is technically not a member anymore.

















