BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Finnish author Jaakko Mikkeli was accused by Norwegian

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon May 07, 2018 8:46 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Finnish author Jaakko Mikkeli was accused by Norwegian author Kirsten Halden of plagiarizing a book that she had written and that had been published 20 years before Mikkeli's. The two books, although set in different periods and regions, contain enough plot similarities to make coincidental resemblance unlikely. Mikkeli's defense rests on his argument that plagiarism was impossible in this case because Halden's book has been published only in Norwegian, a language Mikkeli does not understand, and because no reviews of Halden's book have ever been published.

The argument in Mikkeli's defense depends on the assumption that

(A) Mikkeli has never met Halden
(B) Halden's book did not become popular in Norway
C) nobody related the plot of Halden's book in detail to Mikkeli before Mikkeli wrote his book
(D) there is a common European myth to which both authors referred subconsciously in the books in question
(E) Mikkeli is not familiar with Old lcelandic, an extinct language related to an earlier form of Norwegian
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by BTGmoderatorRO » Thu May 10, 2018 10:00 am
Option A: Invalid
The sentence under consideration here lacks merit because the original article never stated nor did it, it inferred that a meeting took place or not whether in the past or currently between the two authors. It is possible they had met but for language differences.

Option B:Invalid
This is a weak statement that only sought to discredit the Halden.
The book was not stated to be unpopular in Norway and as such would be tantamount to blasphemy to generalize so.

Option C: invalid
This option puts the finish author in a disadvantage position in that, if the book had been licensed worldwide with or being without popular, his excuse would not have been convincing enough because he does not need and review help from. Anyone in this regard.

Option D: Valid
This summarily give a proper and accurate description of what happened by suggesting that they never read each other's books before writing yet, there were similarities that makes it coincidental.

Option E: Invalid
This puts Mikkeli in a weak position as the saying goes ''ignorance of something is not an excuse'' so, not being familiar with the icelandic language is not a palatable defense of the accusation.
Join the discussion