BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP INEQUALITY ??

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by akshatsingh » Fri May 02, 2008 2:16 am
My answer is C.

Is that correct ?
Join the discussion

by amitansu » Fri May 02, 2008 4:11 am
I just have a small confusion !!

The q says : Are x and y both positive ?
1. 2x-2y=1
2. x/y>1

In statement 2 we have x/y >1 => x > y
then pluggin some valus of x and y we can have results like :

x=3; y=2 so x/y >1 (both are positive)
x=-3; y=-2 so x/y >1( but x is smaller than y, which contradicts the inequality condition !!)
x=1/2 and y=1/3then x/y >1 (both are positive and x>y)
x=-1/2 and y= -1/3 then x/y >1 (x is smaller than y here)

So for me seems like , it can be concluded both are positive under this condition !!

Can anybody throw some light !!
Join the discussion

by amitansu » Fri May 02, 2008 8:35 pm
Any expert's solution for this confusion....


I request Stuart/Ron can you please help !!


regards,
Amit
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat May 03, 2008 10:43 am
amitansu wrote:I just have a small confusion !!

In statement 2 we have x/y >1 => x > y

Can anybody throw some light !!
Your problem stems from your manipulation of this inequality.

We have to be VERY careful when we manipulate inequalities. Remember, if you multiple or divide both sides by a negative, you need to reverse the inequality.

So:

x/y > 1

To get to "x > y", you actually multiply both sides by "y". So, we get two solutions:

if y > 0, then x > y

However, if y < 0, we actually get x < y.

So, we are allowed to pick x = -3 and y = -2, since:

-3/-2 = 1.5 > 1
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by aditikedia » Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:10 pm
Hey Stuart,

In this question, aren't there 2 situations?

1) x and y - Both positive
2) x and y - Both negative

x/y > 1

Now, if y is positive, then x>y, however, if y is negative, then, x<y.

Therefore how is the answer c?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:43 pm
aditikedia wrote:Hey Stuart,

In this question, aren't there 2 situations?

1) x and y - Both positive
2) x and y - Both negative

x/y > 1

Now, if y is positive, then x>y, however, if y is negative, then, x<y.

Therefore how is the answer c?
My previous post didn't even address the whole question, I was just responding the manipulation of statement (2).

Looking at the statements together, we know that:

(1) x - y = 1/2

and

(2) if y is negative, y > x; and
if y is positive, then x > y.

We can rewrite (1) as:

x - y = 1/2
x = y + 1/2

If x = y + 1/2, then x MUST be greater than y, which means it's no longer possible for x and y to both be negative (since when that happens, y > x).

Therefore, if both statements are true, x and y must both be positive.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by aditikedia » Sat Aug 09, 2008 7:52 pm
Thanks Stuart!
Join the discussion

by II » Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:42 pm
what level question would you say this is ?
Also are there any other approaches to solve this one ?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:18 pm
from statement 1----x/y - 1 = 0.5 * 1/y (divide by y both sides)

from statement 2----x/y>1

Combine both--- x/y -1 must be positive number.This implies RHS must be positive.This further implies 1/y must be positive.

therefore x & y must be positive.
Join the discussion