BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

The soap manufacturer conceded

Expert replies
by sameerballani » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:24 am
The soap manufacturer conceded that its product may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin irritation experienced by its consumers and having pulled the product, led to a sharp drop in the company's share price.

A)having pulled the product, led to

B)pulled the product, leading to

C)pulling the product, leading to

D)pulled the product, led to

E)pulled the product, having led to

OA:B

Can we discuss this. how to eliminate wrong options. how to approach, etc.

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by cans » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:41 am
IMO B
to maintain parallelism, pulled should be used
A,C eliminated
e) having led to is incorrect
led to a sharp drop, cause-effect (product was pulled and thus share price dropped)
So
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:49 am
Agree with Cans and reached B using the same approach.
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:55 am
The soap manufacturer conceded that its product may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin irritation experienced by its consumers and having pulled the product, led to a sharp drop in the company's share price.

A)having pulled the product, led to -------> changes the intended meaning as can mean "soap manufacturer pulled the product"

B)pulled the product, leading to -------> leading modifies the complete part before comma "The soap manufacturer conceded that its product may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin irritation experienced by its consumers and pulled the product"

C)pulling the product,leading to ------> pulling not parallel with initial part of the sentence

D)pulled the product, led to

E)pulled the product, having led to
Join the discussion

by sameerballani » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:42 am
pulled is parallel to???
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:08 am
sameerballani wrote:pulled is parallel to???
conceded
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1