Household's Cash Income

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

Household's Cash Income

by imskpwr » Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:28 am
The United States government uses only a household's cash income before taxes to determine whether that household falls below the poverty line in a given year; capital gains, non-cash government benefits, and tax credits are not included. However, yearly cash income is not a fool-proof measure of a given household's disposable income. For example, retirees who live off of capital gains from an extensive portfolio could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet be classified by the government as living in "poverty" because this income is not included in the calculation.

Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty?
a)For more than 99% of those classified as living in poverty, yearly cash income comprises the vast majority of each household's disposable income.
b)While the government's calculation method indicated a 12.5% poverty rate in 2003, the same calculation method indicated anywhere from a 9% to a 16% poverty rate during the preceding decade.
c)Most established research studies conducted by the private sector indicate that the number of people truly living in poverty in the U.S. is less than that indicated by the government's calculation method.
d)Several prominent economists endorse an alternate calculation method which incorporates all income, not just cash income, and adjusts for taxes paid and other core expenses.
e)The government's calculation method also erroneously counts those who do not earn income in a given year but who have substantial assets on which to live during that year.

[spoiler]I don't know why c is better than e. "e" is a more straightforward reason.[/spoiler]
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:35 am
The United States government uses only a household's cash income before taxes to determine whether that household falls below the poverty line in a given year; capital gains, non-cash government benefits, and tax credits are not included. - facts
However, yearly cash income is not a fool-proof measure of a given household's disposable income. -- conclusion
For example, retirees who live off of capital gains from an extensive portfolio could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet be classified by the government as living in "poverty" because this income is not included in the calculation. - an example is always an additional premise stated to bolster an opinion/theory....here its giving an example a case how the conclusion stands


Here we are not asked to weaken the stimulus - we are asked to invalidate the goverment's calculation method !!
Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty

So C stand out and E falls.

Hope this helps !!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:44 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by agarwalmanoj2000 » Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:12 pm
I don't know why c is better than e. "e" is a more straightforward reason.
Goal is to find an option which strengthens/validate the claim that govt. calculation method must be changed.

e)The government's calculation method also erroneously counts those who do not earn income in a given year but who have substantial assets on which to live during that year.

This is already given in the argument that existing calculation method does not consider non cash income, so people who have substantial assets are also considered living in poverty. Option E just restates a premise of the argument, so it cannot strengthen. Information already given in the argument cannot strengthen or weaken an argument.

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:49 am
Request some expert to kindly help on this one.

Regards.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:49 pm
Mankey-
Manoj explained it well. Reason why C > E (actually E is not even in league of CORRECT ans) depends on understanding of the QUESTION.
Question is which option INTENSIFY that govt should change its approach. Now think, to say a measurement method needs to be changed we need to show some evidence that results of current method are INCORRECT. ONLY C DOES THIS.
E states a point that "government's calculation method also erroneously counts..." THIS is only a statement BUT not an evidence. Take it this way - Different people may raise different points but only who SHOWS/PROVES its point will WIN.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)