Need experts help in this question

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

Need experts help in this question

by saketk » Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:35 pm
Many local town governments in New England still practice direct democracy where the population of the town votes to resolve issues. Critics of these town councils argue that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the critics’ argument?

(A) Groups that oppose well-funded special interest groups do not have the budgets to mount major media campaigns in local markets.
(B) Direct elections are not effective because individual citizens do not have as much knowledge as professional legislators.
(C) Since individual voters make the decision, direct democracy provides insurance against the influence of wealthy special interest groups.
(D) Local newspapers and TV stations tend to be biased in favor of special interest groups and provide unbalanced reporting to local citizens.
(E) Decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest.

I found this question in gmatclub forum. OA given is A but I think the answer should be E.

Please let me know your views.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:23 am
E) just mentions that decisions tally with well funded special interest. We don't know whether they are actually influenced. there may exist other reasons for same views/decisions.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by garima99 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:26 am
saketk wrote:Many local town governments in New England still practice direct democracy where the population of the town votes to resolve issues. Critics of these town councils argue that well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the argument?

(A) Groups that oppose well-funded special interest groups do not have the budgets to mount major media campaigns in local markets. the groups dat cannot influence are not well funded.last line is re-phrased.
(B) Direct elections are not effective because individual citizens do not have as much knowledge as professional legislators.
(C) Since individual voters make the decision, direct democracy provides insurance against the influence of wealthy special interest groups.
(D) Local newspapers and TV stations tend to be biased in favor of special interest groups and provide unbalanced reporting to local citizens.
(E) Decisions by local town governments usually are in line with the views of well-funded special interest. maybe it is a coincidence that there view match.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:35 am

by dev.gavande » Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:58 am
Can someone explain why B is not correct?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:10 am
b) is out of scope.
Argument is: well-funded special interest groups are able to influence these large open referenda..
Nowhere it says that direct elections are effective or not. and legislators are out of scope..
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!