BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

After decreasing steadily!

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:28 am
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.

(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

How I have advanced:

students in the United States finishing=> Means that the United States is finishing.
=> So, A, B, and C are out.

D=> Either XX or YY is the correct idiom, where XX and YY MUST be parallel.

Either FINISHED or they is not correct.

So, D is out.

Answer is E.

Question:
Am I right in eliminating the options A, B, and C?


Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by The Jock » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:16 am
I guess you are almost right in eliminating A,B and C.
Here it seems that percentage itself is finishing not the students, so it is creating meaning error.
Thanks and Regards,
Varun
https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:18 am
I agree with your below statement

students in the United States finishing=> Means that the United States is finishing.
=> So, A, B, and C are out.

In general, a noun followed directly by an -ing (no comma) is a noun modifier set up.

Refer this detailed and long thread on "-ING" Modifier for more information.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ing-modifier ... 38943.html
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:11 pm
gmat_perfect wrote:After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.

(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and

How I have advanced:

students in the United States finishing=> Means that the United States is finishing.
=> So, A, B, and C are out.

D=> Either XX or YY is the correct idiom, where XX and YY MUST be parallel.

Either FINISHED or they is not correct.

So, D is out.

Answer is E.

Question:
Am I right in eliminating the options A, B, and C?


Thanks.
Well my take on the elimination of A, B and C is little different. We are talking about 1990's so the action is no more progressive. It is completed.

Now, the percentage of students in the United States.......is a noun phrase

First of all, "% of students finishing" or "students finishing" conveys the same meaning. It is some number of students who finished.

I do not see a meaning coming out that the united states finishing. In case of prepositional phrases, we consider legitimate noun that needs to be modified.

So the strong reason, in my opinion, to eliminate A, B and C is word "finishing" itself as it show continuous / progressive action, which is not intended, rather not logical here.
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:32 pm
My pick E
Rearranging the answer choice E.
--> increased in the last three years of the decade, from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998 to 86.5 percent in 2000

Other options got the following issues.
(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:07 pm
Yes, use of "up to" in option A is also suspect. Also, it contains "having earned" which makes it a less attractive option.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1