Construction

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Philippines
Thanked: 3 times

Construction

by fighting_cax » Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:39 pm
In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
(D) The government’s construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.

OA is A

Please explain.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gg1 » Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:45 pm
A shud be the correct answer.

[A] Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

This assumption leads to the conclusion that government is not doing any wasteful expenditure .

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.
This will undermine the conclusion

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.
This will undermine the conclusion

(D) The government’s construction projects would not, on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
This is a little relevant but A beats it

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.
The government has a valid reason as the buildings are not suitable for courts ...

Wat is the OA

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:37 am
in several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.

conclusion : The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Use negation test :

IMO A
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
Thanked: 16 times

by amitabhprasad » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:48 am
can any one point why "D" is not the right choice ?
I think it is very close to "A"

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Philippines
Thanked: 3 times

by fighting_cax » Sat May 16, 2009 1:02 am
gg1 wrote:A shud be the correct answer.

(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are more cost-effective.
The government has a valid reason as the buildings are not suitable for courts ...
Doesn't "establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there are no alernatives that are more cost-effective" include the option of adopting the vacant space for the government facilities?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:14 am

by Brad.C » Sun May 15, 2016 6:51 am
(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government's requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
I believe the answer should be A