About ISSUE~ pick a side or see both sides???? HELP~~

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:690
5. "All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done."


My teacher told me when analyse an issue, u must pick a side that will "win out" in the conclusion/introduction. However, i found this issue hard to "pick a side".. I feel both sides are OK and i really don't want to pick a side...(Because only analysing one side is really difficult to write 400+ words, and I really really think that both sides have its advantages and disadvantages, whether to choose depends on certain circumstance)...

So, can I take the notion that "each of the alternatives are viable in certain circumstance"? And i found it easier for me to write in this way. I analyse both advantages and disadvantages about the two alternatives.... can I????
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:7 members

by grockit_andrea » Mon May 17, 2010 6:34 am
Be very careful if you decide to "see both sides." I haven't professionally scored GMAT essays, but I've been a professional scorer for many other tests, and the scoring rubric is always the same on one point: if a student picks one side, in order to get a good score he need to provide a strong argument for that side. But if a student decides to "fence-sit," he has to provide a strong argument for BOTH sides in order to get the same score. By that, I mean that the (approximately) 5 paragraph length we looked for in an essay that had a single viewpoint was almost doubled in a fence-sitter essay. If you took your 5 paragraphs and split them between two viewpoints, we didn't see that as a 5; we saw it as 2 short essays cobbled together, and that would earn probably a 2 or a 3, depending on how it was done. If the GMAT rubric is similar (and I suspect it probably is) then no matter how well you see both sides, your reader has no choice but to hold you to a higher standard, one that might be difficult to meet with the time constraints of the test.
If you have trouble getting a long enough essay out of supporting a single side, try devoting a paragraph to mentioning what an opposing argument would be, and then disproving it. Then you get to use the alternate viewpoint but still stick to one perspective.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 12:31 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:690

by rx_11 » Tue May 18, 2010 2:07 am
Thanks so much~~~~~~~:)[/spoiler]

• Page 1 of 1