BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

ticks

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:08 pm
Thanked: 8 times

ticks

by jimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:37 pm
Lyme disease is caused by a bacterium transmitted to humans by deer ticks. Generally
deer ticks pick up the bacterium while in the larval stage from feeding on infected whitefooted mice. However, certain other species on which the larvae feed do not harbor the bacterium. Therefore, if the population of these other species were increased, the number of ticks acquiring the bacterium and hence the number of people contracting Lyme disease-would likely decline.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Ticks do not suffer any adverse consequences from carrying the bacterium that
causes Lyme disease in humans.
B. There are no known cases of a human's contracting Lyme disease through contact
with white-footed mice.
C. A deer tick feeds only once while in the larval stage.
D. A single host animal can be the source of bacteria for many tick larvae.
E. None of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor other bacteria that
ticks transmit to humans.

OA to come..
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:16 pm
You are looking for an answer that would indicate fewer larvae would contract the bacteria.

C does this because all else being equal the proportion of food containing the bacteria would be lower if the population of other animals increased. Thus, a lower proportion of ticks would be infected.

Answer = C.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Tue Jul 04, 2017 11:16 am
I received a request to answer this one...

Whenever you're asked to STRENGTHEN or WEAKEN an argument, it's implied that there is a logical flaw - a missing piece - in the argument. Break down the argument carefully and identify what's missing before diving into the answer choices.

Premises:
- deer ticks pick up Lyme bacterium while in larval stage, feeding on white-footed mice
- larvae also feed on other species that do not carry the bacterium

Conclusion:
If the non-bacterium-carrying species were increased, the NUMBER of ticks carrying the bacterium would decline, and the NUMBER of people with the disease would decline

Logical Flaws:
Pay particular attention to the word "number" in CR. Can we justify that fewer ticks would get the disease if we increased other food supplies? Imagine that there was some contaminated yogurt in your fridge. If I said, "just add other food to the fridge, and you won't get sick." Is that logical? You could still get sick if you also ate the yogurt, in addition to the non-contaminated food.

The flaw in this argument: the author is assuming that if there are more non-infected food sources, then there will be ticks who do not feed on ANY infected sources (the white-footed mice). The argument would be invalid if we found out that ticks fed a little bit on white-footed mice in addition to the other new sources.

Strengthen:
In order to strengthen the argument, we need to make it MORE LIKELY that the ticks (at least some of them) were avoiding white-footed mice altogether.

A. Ticks do not suffer any adverse consequences from carrying the bacterium that causes Lyme disease in humans.
Irrelevant. We only care whether they acquire it.

B. There are no known cases of a human's contracting Lyme disease through contact with white-footed mice.
Irrelevant. The chain of transmission is white-footed mice --> ticks --> humans.

C. A deer tick feeds only once while in the larval stage.
If this were true, then it reduces the possibility that the ticks are feeding on white-footed mice AND these non-infected species. This makes it MORE LIKELY that the ticks (at least some of them) were avoiding white-footed mice altogether. Correct!

D. A single host animal can be the source of bacteria for many tick larvae.
Yes, but that animal could be a white-footed mouse (leading to more carriers) or some other species (fewer carriers). Unclear whether this helps or hurts.

E. None of the other species on which deer tick larvae feed harbor other bacteria that ticks transmit to humans
Other bacteria are irrelevant to our argument, which only deals with Lyme disease.

The answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1