BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan - error?

Expert replies
by singhsa » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:35 pm
If x < 0 and 4 < 5 - xy < 5, which of the following must be true?

I y < 0
II xy < 1

In this question, the answer is
I and II

But, from the equation, we get that 0<xy<1. Thus xy must be between 0 and 1. If xy= -20, the statement would not be valid. So, how can we consider statement II from the question to be true?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Gurpinder » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:09 pm
If x < 0 and 4 < 5 - xy < 5, which of the following must be true?

I y < 0
II xy < 1


simplify 4 < 5 - xy < 5 and you get 1 > xy. so II is true.

x is a -ve. y cannot be < 0 because then -ve times -ve = +.

y is a positive fraction less than 1.

hence the answer should be II.
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:18 pm
singhsa wrote:If x < 0 and 4 < 5 - xy < 5, which of the following must be true?

I y < 0
II xy < 1

In this question, the answer is
I and II

But, from the equation, we get that 0<xy<1. Thus xy must be between 0 and 1. If xy= -20, the statement would not be valid. So, how can we consider statement II from the question to be true?
If 0 < xy < 1, then it is certainly true that xy < 1; that's what the right-hand portion of the inequality 0 < xy < 1 says. If 0 < xy < 1, then it is impossible for xy to be equal to -20, so your example is not germane here. Note that you are not asked here to find an answer which is equivalent to the inequalities in the question. You are only asked to find one which must be true. If we had a third item which read, for example:

III) xy > -9

that would also be true here; we know that xy is between 0 and 1, so it's certainly bigger than -9.

Further, if we know that x is negative and that xy is positive, then y is certainly negative, so I must be true.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by singhsa » Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:09 pm
Ian Stewart wrote:
III) xy > -9

that would also be true here; we know that xy is between 0 and 1, so it's certainly bigger than -9.

Further, if we know that x is negative and that xy is positive, then y is certainly negative, so I must be true.[/quote

Thanks Ian. This helps.
Join the discussion