BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Electronics company: Quesion on choice E

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

Electronics company: Quesion on choice E

by vittalgmat » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:37 am
The electronics company has unveiled what it claims to be the world's smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, and it weighs less than 11 ounces.

A. to be the world's smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, and it weighs
B. to be the smallest network digital camcorder in the world, which is as long as a handheld computer, weighing
C. is the smallest network digital camcorder in the world, which is as long as a handheld computer, and it weighs
D. is the world's smallest network digital camcorder, which is as long as a handheld computer and weighs
E. is the world's smallest network digital camcorder, the length of which is that of a handheld computer, weighing

In the sentence above, I have a question on choice E.
Which clause does weighing modify?
'That of a handheld computer" ie
'length of a handheld computer' ?

Ron, Stuart, Stewart?

thanks a lot
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 124
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:33 am
Thanked: 35 times

by NikolayZ » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:05 pm
Hey mate, I am not an expert but i'll try to answer your questions.
First of all, i believe that the right answer is D.
A,B - Claim to be - is incorrect
C - pronoun "it" has two possible antecedents.
E - weighing is the present participle and can not modify a noun. Moreover it is unclear what exactly "weighing" modifies - length, computer or camcorder.

D - has parallel and clear structure and meaning. Camcorder IS the longest ... and weighs....

2) That of a handheld computer really means length of the handheld computer.

Hope it helped.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:03 pm
NikolayZ wrote:Hey mate, I am not an expert but i'll try to answer your questions.
First of all, i believe that the right answer is D.
A,B - Claim to be - is incorrect
C - pronoun "it" has two possible antecedents.
E - weighing is the present participle and can not modify a noun. Moreover it is unclear what exactly "weighing" modifies - length, computer or camcorder.

D - has parallel and clear structure and meaning. Camcorder IS the longest ... and weighs....

2) That of a handheld computer really means length of the handheld computer.

Hope it helped.
Thanks.. I know D is the OA :)
Also "claim(s) to be" can be correct.. check this link.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/use ... 20unveiled
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:33 am
vittalgmat wrote:In the sentence above, I have a question on choice E.
Which clause does weighing modify?
'That of a handheld computer" ie
'length of a handheld computer' ?

Ron, Stuart, Stewart?

thanks a lot
when you have a COMMA + -ING modifier, two things apply:
* the modifier itself MODIFIES THE PRECEDING CLAUSE (not just the noun that precedes the comma);
and
* the SUBJECT of the preceding clause is the IMPLIED SUBJECT of the -ING word.

the above 2 principles explain what is wrong with (e): the nearest clause has "the length of which" as its subject. therefore, "..., weighing" is making the ludicrous proposition that the length weighs about 11 ounces.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:56 am
lunarpower wrote:
vittalgmat wrote:In the sentence above, I have a question on choice E.
Which clause does weighing modify?
'That of a handheld computer" ie
'length of a handheld computer' ?

Ron, Stuart, Stewart?

thanks a lot
when you have a COMMA + -ING modifier, two things apply:
* the modifier itself MODIFIES THE PRECEDING CLAUSE (not just the noun that precedes the comma);
and
* the SUBJECT of the preceding clause is the IMPLIED SUBJECT of the -ING word.

the above 2 principles explain what is wrong with (e): the nearest clause has "the length of which" as its subject. therefore, "..., weighing" is making the ludicrous proposition that the length weighs about 11 ounces.
Thanks Ron,
As always, U are the GOD!!!.

rgds
-V
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:16 pm

by hk_4u » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:18 pm
Hi Ron
the modifier itself MODIFIES THE PRECEDING CLAUSE


I understand why option E is wrong as per your reasoning. But I thought
the length of which is that of a handheld computer

is a modifier and the preceding clause in this case is
what it claims is the world's smallest network digital camcorder
Even with this reasoning, option E is incorrect (as camcorder is NOT the subject)

My question :

when looking back for the preceding clause, can we ignore the modifiers and the appositives ?
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:10 am
hk_4u wrote:My question :

when looking back for the preceding clause, can we ignore the modifiers and the appositives ?
hmm

from what i've seen, the COMMA -ING modifier usually modifies the closest clause.

so, if you have a clause inside a modifier (and that happens to be the nearest clause), then you're probably going to be modifying that clause.

viz.:
Joe laughed at his friend, who had knocked over the table, spilling things everywhere.
--> in this sentence, the COMMA -ING modifier (spilling) modifies the CLOSEST clause - i.e., "who had knocked over the table". this is a subordinate clause, but it's still a clause.
--> i think it's almost always going to be this way - it would be EXTREMELY awkward and unclear to use this sort of modifier to modify the main clause in this case. doing so wolud result in a sentence that would be, for all practical purposes, unreadable.

on the other hand, if the modifier is not a clause, then, yes, you can ignore it when you look for what is being modified by the COMMA -ING modifier.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1