Bold faced CR

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

Bold faced CR

by GmatKiss » Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:38 am
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:27 am
IMO D.
first part is a conclusion. 2nd part is also a conclusion.

only option D makes sense.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami

Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:22 am
IMO option D

Reason: - it is evident that there are two contrasting conclusion present here.. the first one is an intermediate conclusion and the final i.e. the latter conclusion call the intermediate conclusion by providing an alternate reason for the action (buying of share).

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:24 pm

by varungoel » Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:29 pm
What is the reason the answer could not be C? In the exam i would pick between C & D.

The second boldface part says " they might..." and option C says '..second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.'

Is C incorrect because there is no 'evidence'?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pune
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:660

by 786 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:51 am
They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.


top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness -> is this conclusion ? doesnt look like . I think this is evidence for the intermediate conclusion -> worrisome rumors must be false .

IMO , the main conclusion is : They might well be overoptimistic .

There is no option that has first part as evidence and second as main conclusion .
IMO , D .

This question is confusing . need expert help !