television talk shows

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:30 pm
Thanked: 22 times

television talk shows

by neoreaves » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:30 am
Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely are found on television talk shows, and it might be thought that this state of affairs is a product of the political agenda of the television stations themselves. In fact, television stations are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to capture the largest possible share of the television audience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appeal to large numbers of people. As a result, political opinions and analyses aired on television talk shows are typically bland and innocuous .



An assumption made in the explanation offered by the author of the passage is that


(A) most television viewers cannot agree on which elements of a particular opinion or analysis are most disturbing.


(B) there are television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing.


(C) each television viewer holds some opinion that is outside the political mainstream, but those opinions are not the same for everyone.


(D)there are television shows on which economic forces have an even greater impact than they do on television talk shows.


(E) the television talk shows of different stations resemble one another in most respects.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:18 pm

by bichoo » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:50 am
Tough one..i'm going to guess B

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Thu Apr 22, 2010 7:24 am
bichoo wrote:Tough one..i'm going to guess B
@bichoo..

Under these tough circumstances, I suggest you to use Kaplan Denial Test/negate Test.

Try them on option A. U shall see whole conclusion of the argument falls apart.

Pick A

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:30 pm
Thanked: 22 times

by neoreaves » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:47 am
OA is B

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:48 am
Time 2:22
Too long (May have to make time from other question ....lol)
My take is E

Which means author assumes all tv shows and station are same....

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:51 am
neoreaves wrote:OA is B
is it?
well i think there is no indication of any thing like controversy and disturbing things in the question.
So,i think it would be injecting new information or reader guessing or using extra brain(or information) if that really is the answer.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:15 pm
Can somebody help me to understand why not E? what is the source of this Q?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:58 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by CrazyGmatter » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:15 pm
The argument tells that television shows are a product of political agenda..

On the other hand it tells that TV shows are driven by economic forces...

Finally concludes that the political analysis is bland and innocuous..

this implies that there are other tv shows that have a greater economic impact than does TV talk shows which do political analysis.

picked D.

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:20 pm
CrazyGmatter wrote:The argument tells that television shows are a product of political agenda..

On the other hand it tells that TV shows are driven by economic forces...

Finally concludes that the political analysis is bland and innocuous..

this implies that there are other tv shows that have a greater economic impact than does TV talk shows which do political analysis.

picked D.
i think you have fallen in to trick here....
"television stations are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods."

It is about television station not a comparision between 2 shows ....(whole station is driven to economic forces..)

but what D does is
compare 2 shows....which is more driven by economic forces....for which there is no any evidence to decide in passage...
so I feel it cannot be D...

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:00 pm
Thanked: 136 times
Followed by:62 members

by KapTeacherEli » Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:50 pm
Step 1 of the Kaplan Method: Analyze the question stem.

Here, the magic word is 'Assumption'. We know what we're dealing with, and so we know what we're going to do: the author will cite evidence leading to his or her conclusion, and the question is asking us for a fact that is necessary to bridge a gap between that evidence and that conclusion.

Step 2 of the Kaplan Method: Untangle the Stimulus.

'Untangle' means we don't just read blindly, we read looking for specific information. Since this is an assumption question, we know that we should be looking for the Conclusion and the Evidence. Fortunately, the author gives us some great material to work with: the key phrase 'in fact'. This nicely ID's the conclusion for us, which we can paraphrase as "Economic forces, not political agendas, are the reason that TV talk shows only have mainstream politics." The evidence too is conveniently tagged for us with a 'because'. We paraphrase the evidence as "Networks air only shows that capture large audiences."

Step 3 of the Kaplan Method: Predict the Answer.

So what's the gap that we need to fill? It's helpful to look for scope shifts, changes in terminology between the evidence and the conclusion. In this case, we have a major one. The evidence is discussing large audiences, but the conclusion discusses mainstream politics. What do those have to do with one another? Who's to say that the political views of a TV talk show has anything to do with it's audience?

The author is trying to claim that mainstream political opinion gets large audiences. But he doesn't actually state that this is the case! The author is therefore relying on the unstated assumption that non-mainstream opinions drive away a significant portion of the audience. And since this is an Assumption question, we have our answer: we look for a choice that says that people will not watch political opinions they do not like.

Step 4 of the Kaplan Method: Evaluate the Answer Choice.

(B) Matches our prediction exactly.

Because we've made a prediction, we aren't tempted by trap choice (E). But if we had to rule out (E), we would do so because it says shows are like each other in 'most' respects. There is, in fact, exactly ONE respect this author claims they share: politics. Any other similarities, or lack thereof, are outside the scope of this argument.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage