BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Plz. explain this CR

Expert replies
by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:30 am
George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?
(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit
(B) Doctors who increase their profits by specializing only in diseases that affect a large percentage of the population
(C) Grocers who raise the price of food in order to increase their profit margins
(D) Oil companies that decrease the price of their oil in order to increase their market share
(E) Bakers and surgeons who earn a profit by supplying other peoples’ basic needs
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:42 am
I am not clear with this CR. Plz. help me understand this.
Join the discussion

by k_abhi19 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:42 pm
George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?
(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit

This is a real tough one... :roll: ..... i think the answer should be A... the quote (in a gist) is about a situation in which surgeons for pecuniary interest will start cutting legs unnecessarily making the nation despair of political humanity....
This illustration is best applicable to criticize the situation mentioned in option A... which talks about a similar situation in which Dentists perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit....... HTH :)
Join the discussion

by lachlanc » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:19 pm
yup, i agree. A
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:22 pm
k_abhi19 wrote:George Bernard Shaw wrote: “That any sane nation, having observed that you could provide for the supply of bread by giving bakers a pecuniary interest in baking for you, should go on to give a surgeon a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg is enough to make one despair of political humanity.”
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?
(A) Dentists who perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit

This is a real tough one... :roll: ..... i think the answer should be A... the quote (in a gist) is about a situation in which surgeons for pecuniary interest will start cutting legs unnecessarily making the nation despair of political humanity....
This illustration is best applicable to criticize the situation mentioned in option A... which talks about a similar situation in which Dentists perform unnecessary dental work in order to earn a profit....... HTH :)
What's problem with C or D
Join the discussion

by lachlanc » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:38 pm
What the question asks is to draw a parallel between one of the choices (A through E) and the example given in the original statement.

The original statement refers to the practice of giving "a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg" - this means to give surgeons money to cut off legs. This IMPLIES that surgeons will cut off legs that DO NOT REQUIRE REMOVAL.

Now, find an example that is equivocal. C and D are normal activities that exist in a free market. A refers to UNNECESSARY procedures performed by dentists.

Does this help?
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:17 pm
lachlanc wrote:What the question asks is to draw a parallel between one of the choices (A through E) and the example given in the original statement.

The original statement refers to the practice of giving "a pecuniary interest in cutting off your leg" - this means to give surgeons money to cut off legs. This IMPLIES that surgeons will cut off legs that DO NOT REQUIRE REMOVAL.

Now, find an example that is equivocal. C and D are normal activities that exist in a free market. A refers to UNNECESSARY procedures performed by dentists.

Does this help?
Thanks....
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:12 am
Join the discussion

by EricLien9122 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:53 am
Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?


I don't think answer A is the right choice, because the question ask "criticizing", which IMO, it's asking for something that's totally opposite?

I would of guess E on this one, because E has the opposite effect of what Shaw said.
Join the discussion

by lachlanc » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:27 pm
EricLien9122 wrote:Shaw’s statement would best serve as an illustration in an argument criticizing which of the following?


I don't think answer A is the right choice, because the question ask "criticizing", which IMO, it's asking for something that's totally opposite?

I would of guess E on this one, because E has the opposite effect of what Shaw said.
No, his statement was critical of the practice of paying surgeons to cut off legs. The question asks for an illustration to assist in his criticism. A is the only answer which could do this.
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:56 am
Option E looks good than other answers.
Join the discussion