BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Triangle in XP plane

Expert replies
by sugmomo » Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:45 am
Hi.. can u please give a detailed explanation for the below prob...

Right triangle PQR is to be constructed in the xy-plane so that the right angle is at P and PR is parallel to the x-axis. The x and y coordinates of P, Q and R are to be integers that satisfy the inequalities -4 <= x <= 5 and 6 <= y <= 16. How many different triangles with these properties could be constructed?

(A) 110
(B) 1,100
(C) 9,900
(D) 10,000
(E) 12,100
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:51 am
Join the discussion

by Rich@VeritasPrep » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:55 am
kvcpk: Your explanation is right on!

And FYI, not only could this question be on the GMAT...but it was! This question is a retired question that now appears in the Official Guide.
Rich Zwelling
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:57 am
raz1024 wrote:kvcpk: Your explanation is right on!

And FYI, not only could this question be on the GMAT...but it was! This question is a retired question that now appears in the Official Guide.
Cant believe that.. can it be done in 2 mins? for first 1 min I had no clue how to start.
Join the discussion

by Rich@VeritasPrep » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:07 am
Remember, the GMAT is an adaptive test, which means that it tailors itself to your level. Although it's not 100 percent correlative, in general, the better you do, the more difficult the questions get. So if you get this question, that likely means you're doing very well.

That said, you don't have to get every question correct to get the score you want. If you find yourself spending an inordinate amount of time on a question, it might be time to move on. No one question is so important that you should spend 4 to 5 minutes on it. This question is SUPPOSED to be extremely difficult. And because it's so difficult, missing it won't likely impact your score to a huge degree.
Rich Zwelling
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:12 am
Thanks for the info Raz!!
Join the discussion