how many employees are trained to work in all 3 restaurants?

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:40 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
At a certain resort, each of the 39 food service employees is trained to work in a minimum of 1 restaurant and a maximum of 3 restaurants. The 3 restaurants are the family buffet, the dining room, and the snack bar. Exactly 19 employees are trained to work in the family buffet, 18 are trained to work in the dining room, and 12 are trained to work in the snack bar. If 4 employees are trained to work in exactly 2 restaurants, how many employees are trained to work in all 3 restaurants?
a 2
b 3
c 4
d 5
e 6

The IMO is B.... Can some one help me solve it using the formula for three intersecting sets..
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:31 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members

by gmatclubmember » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:09 am
leonswati wrote:At a certain resort, each of the 39 food service employees is trained to work in a minimum of 1 restaurant and a maximum of 3 restaurants. The 3 restaurants are the family buffet, the dining room, and the snack bar. Exactly 19 employees are trained to work in the family buffet, 18 are trained to work in the dining room, and 12 are trained to work in the snack bar. If 4 employees are trained to work in exactly 2 restaurants, how many employees are trained to work in all 3 restaurants?
a 2
b 3
c 4
d 5
e 6

The IMO is B.... Can some one help me solve it using the formula for three intersecting sets..
Is the OA a (2).

Cheers
Ami/-

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:24 am
x- all three cases
39 = 19+18+12-4-2x ; x=3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:40 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by leonswati » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:29 am
Is the formula not:

P(A u B u C) : P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A n B) - P(A n C) - P(B n C) + P(A n B n C)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:31 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members

by gmatclubmember » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:35 am
Yes leon the formula is what you have written.
And I think P (A n B) = P (A n C) = P(B n C) = 4.
which gives us x=2.

Cheers
Ami/-

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:40 am
The formula is correct, but I am not sure what exactly you are looking for

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:40 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by leonswati » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:42 am
How can we derive to the answer 3 using the formula

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:59 pm

by prachi.sakhare » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:16 am
Ami,
Could you please explain this formula a bit more...? I though the answer should be 2 here.

Prachi

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:31 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members

by gmatclubmember » Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:28 am
Please see the explanation of Geva@MasterGMAT
here
https://www.beatthegmat.com/how-many-emp ... 91285.html

Cheers
Ami/-