DS - positive integers

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:19 am
Thanked: 4 times

DS - positive integers

by Xbond » Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:14 am
Hi there,

Could you explain in the simplest this concept and how to resolve it


x, y, k, m are positive integers, is xk a factor of ym ?
(1) x is a factor of y
(2) k <= m
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 11:53 am
Thanked: 6 times

by navalpike » Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:46 am
I would go with E

(Y)(M) = (X)(K) (a)

1. If x is a factor of Y, then we still do not know anything about M and K. Insuff.

2. It is not enough to know that K is less than or equal to M. We need to know if k is a "factor" of M.

1 + 2 . No additional info. E

I also used numbers that matched the conditions given in both 1 & 2. For example.

Is (4) (8) = (2) (7) (a)

Here is clear that x is a factor of Y and K is less than M. but Xk is not a factor of YM.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:47 am
Thanked: 3 times

by PussInBoots » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:37 pm
I'd go with E w/o even testing any numbers.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:12 am
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:700

by pradeepsarathy » Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:17 pm
IMO E as well.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 2:47 am
Thanked: 12 times

Re: DS - positive integers

by shahdevine » Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:27 pm
Xbond wrote:Hi there,

Could you explain in the simplest this concept and how to resolve it


x, y, k, m are positive integers, is xk a factor of ym ?
(1) x is a factor of y
(2) k <= m
restate: is ym/xk=integer

s1) y/x=integer but that doesn't resolve m and k insufficient.
s2) k could be equal to m or less than m but that doesn't resolve y and x...
s1+s2) y and x is sorted out but m and k are not. m could equal k, which would give us answer yes. but m could also be greater than k, which would us answer no. insufficient.

therefore E

you got this man!