BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ratio of women

Expert replies
by lukaswelker » Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:14 am
Hey Guys

Can seem to understand the answer behind the following question.

The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the number of children in a room is 5:2:7, respectively. What is the total number of people in the room?

(1) the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
(2) there are fewer than 4 men in the room.

How can the second one be sufficient also?

Many thanks
Lukas
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:40 am
lukaswelker wrote: The ratio of the number of women to the number of men to the number of children in a room is 5:2:7, respectively. What is the total number of people in the room?

(1) the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
(2) there are fewer than 4 men in the room.
Target question: What is the total number of people in the room?

Given: women : men : children = 5:2:7
So, there are many possible scenarios where the ratio is 5:2:7. Let's LIST a few:
Scenario #1: 5 women, 2 men, 7 children
Scenario #2: 10 women, 4 men, 14 children
Scenario #3: 15 women, 6 men, 21 children
Scenario #4: 20 women, 8 men, 28 children
.
.
.
and so on

Okay, now let's examine the statements:

Statement 1: the total number of women and children in the room is 12.
Let's check some of the scenarios that we LISTED.
Scenario #1: total number of women and children = 12 (NICE!)
Scenario #2: total number of women and children = 24 (no)
Scenario #3: total number of women and children = 36 (no)
...and so on.
We can see that ONLY scenario #1 fits the information in statement 1.
So, there MUST be 5 women, 2 men, and 7 children
In other words, the total number of people in the room MUST equal 14
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: There are FEWER THAN 4 men in the room.
When we check some of the scenarios that we LISTED, we see that ONLY scenario #1 fits the information in statement 2.
So, there MUST be 5 women, 2 men, and 7 children
In other words, the total number of people in the room MUST equal 14
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:44 am
I should point out that this question relies on our ability to recognize that in this REAL WORLD problem, we must use only positive integers.

So, while 0.5 : 0.2 : 0.7 is equivalent to the ratio 5:2:7, we cannot consider this scenario, since we cannot have 0.5 women, 0.2 men, and 0.7 children

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by amitmj » Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:06 am
Hi Brent,

For the statement 2, can we have Men = 0 as a scenario too ???
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:56 am
amitmj wrote:Hi Brent,

For the statement 2, can we have Men = 0 as a scenario too ???
On the GMAT, problems about ratios are restricted to POSITIVE VALUES.
As Brett has mentioned, this particular problem is further constrained to POSITIVE INTEGERS.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:21 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
amitmj wrote:Hi Brent,

For the statement 2, can we have Men = 0 as a scenario too ???
On the GMAT, problems about ratios are restricted to POSITIVE VALUES.
As Brett has mentioned, this particular problem is further constrained to POSITIVE INTEGERS.
Well said, Midge :-)

Cheers,
Brent - now with 50% less "t"
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion