Set S

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

Set S

by atulmangal » Fri May 06, 2011 4:59 am
Set S consists of five consecutive integers, and set T consists of seven consecutive integers. Is the median of the numbers in set S equal to the median of the numbers in set T?

(1) The median of the numbers in Set S is 0.
(2) The sum of the numbers in set S is equal to the sum of the numbers in set T.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Fri May 06, 2011 6:43 am
OA B?

Stmt 1) Not sufficient.
It tells us that Set S is -2,-1,0,1 and 2.
But It doesnt tel us anything about set T.

Stmt 2:
Sums are equal.
For consecutive numbers, such sums can only be equal if their medians are both 0.
Taking an example,
-1, 0 , 1, 2,3 - Sum is 5.
Now to identify a set of 7 that gives sum 5 is impossible.
-1, 0 , 1, 2,3, 4, 5.

This statement is valid only for one set and that is the sets hovering around 0.

Hence B.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:12 am
Location: Dominican Republic
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:480

by MAAJ » Fri May 06, 2011 7:01 am
IMO B

Because the sum of 5 CI and the sum of 7 CI can only be equal if they are spread apart from 0.
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri May 06, 2011 8:49 am
Sorry brothers

OA is not B..lets wait for some expert after that i vll reveal the OA

Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Fri May 06, 2011 12:55 pm
my try
to me the answer is C
(1) s-2,s-1,s,s+1,s+2 ( 5 consecutive)
t-3,t-2,t-1,t,t+1,t+2,t+3 (7 consecutive)
we need to find does s=t
(1) not suff as it can be
(-2 -1 0 1 2)
(-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3) here s=t=0 yes
but onther version
(-2 -1 0 1 2)
(1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 0 does not equal to 4 the answer is no

(2) the sum of the numbers are equal in both sets
sum=mean*number of terms
in s it will 5*s and in t it will be 7*t (as in series of consecutive numbers mean=median)
5s=7t when is this st holds true?
if s=t=0 in this case the answer is yes
but if s=7 and t=5 , our series will look as
s(5.6.7.8.9) t(2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
the answer is no,
so 2 st insufficient
from both we no that 5s=7t, and s=0 , it comes that t also =0 so both suff

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Stendulkar » Fri May 06, 2011 1:30 pm
Hmmm.... Atul is saying that B isnt the answer so my explanation might be wrong anyway...however...my try :


S : {n,n+1,n+2,n+3,n+4}
T : {m, m+1, m+2, m+3, m+4, m+5, m+6}

We need to check if n+2 = m+3... (i)

Statement 1 :

Median in S = 0
n+2 = 0
n = -2

S : { -2,-1,0,1,2}

No connection with T is given. So insufficient.

Statement 2 :

Sum of elements in S = Sum of elements in T

Theremore, 5n + 10 = 7m + 21

5(n+2) = 7 (m+3)

n+2 = (7/5)(m+3)

Compare the above with (i)

therefore the meadians are not matching. Sufficient.

I am getting B. Statement 2 is correct for sure. Atul says that B isnt correct. So I feel only other option is D. For that Statement 1 has to be correct but dnt understand how..

Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Fri May 06, 2011 1:59 pm
Stendulkar wrote:Hmmm.... Atul is saying that B isnt the answer so my explanation might be wrong anyway...however...my try :


S : {n,n+1,n+2,n+3,n+4}
T : {m, m+1, m+2, m+3, m+4, m+5, m+6}

We need to check if n+2 = m+3... (i)

Statement 1 :

Median in S = 0
n+2 = 0
n = -2

S : { -2,-1,0,1,2}

No connection with T is given. So insufficient.

Statement 2 :

Sum of elements in S = Sum of elements in T

Theremore, 5n + 10 = 7m + 21

5(n+2) = 7 (m+3)

n+2 = (7/5)(m+3)

Compare the above with (i)

therefore the meadians are not matching. Sufficient.

I am getting B. Statement 2 is correct for sure. Atul says that B isnt correct. So I feel only other option is D. For that Statement 1 has to be correct but dnt understand how..
hi Stendulkar
it seems that you are slightly wrong
you got that
5(n+2)=7(m+3) but this equation holds true if
n=-2, and m=-3, 5*(-2+2)=7(-3+3), 0=0
in this case you sets will be
-2,-1,0,1,2 and
-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3 here medians are equal =0
or
5(n+2)=7(m+3) also holds true for
n=5, m=2, 5(5+2)=35, and 7(2+3)=35
and sets are
5,6,7,8,9 and
2.3.4.5.6.7.8 in this case medians 7 and 5 are not equal
for this reason st 2 alone insuff

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Stendulkar » Fri May 06, 2011 2:07 pm
Oops...u are correct...if both the medians are zero then that equation will still hold true...Answer should be E??

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:53 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Stendulkar » Fri May 06, 2011 2:08 pm
This has to be a high difficulty level problem...one that u get when u are cruising at 50 levels on Quant..

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri May 06, 2011 2:32 pm
OA is C guys

@Clock: Good work !!!

I believe its a tough question not because it requires some heavy logic etc but because its a very tricky problem.