Inequality -GMAT PREP

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:53 am
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:3 members

Inequality -GMAT PREP

by guerrero » Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:37 pm
If x is positive, which of the following could be the correct ordering of 1/x, 2x and x^2 ?

I. x^2 < 2x < 1/x
II. x^2 < 1/x < 2x
III. 2x < x^2 < 1/x

(A) None
(B) I only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I II and III

OA D

Plugging in numbers is so time consuming ...What is the smart approach to tackle this type of questions . Kindly suggest
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:17 pm
The most efficient way to do some number picking is to have a plan in advance, and that plan usually involves testing numbers with different properties. How do you do that effectively?

1) Look at the limits. Here they told you that x is positive, which means that x > 0. What are the closest number to that limit of 0? Fractions. If you test a number like 1/4, you'll see that 1 is possible: 1/16 < 1/2 < 4.

1a) The other limit you have is in the statements here. You need the progression "is less than...is less than". You know what doesn't work? "Is equal to" - but "is equal to" is the dividing line between greater than / less than, so pick a number for which those statements give you "equals". For II, try 1, because you know that 1^2 = 1/1. Now, in order to make the squared term smaller than the 1/x term...

2) Think about properties of numbers. Numbers between 0 and 1 are the only numbers that get smaller when you square them. Your limit above was 1^2 = 1/1, so in order to make 1^2 a little smaller, try 0.9. That gives you .81 < "just a little over 1" < 1.8, so you can prove II.

Then, again, thinking about properties of numbers, recognize that III is going to be tough, as x^2 is going to be big for any kind of big number. Again, look to the limits:

2x = x^2 when x is 0 and when x is 2. And 2x is greater than x^2 for anything between those two points. You can't try anything in between, then, and when you go to anything above 2 then 1/x is going to become the smallest because you're dividing by a big number.

_____________________________________________________________

The real key is to think strategically about Limits and Number Properties before you pick numbers.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:46 pm
If x is positive, which of the following could be the correct ordering of 1/x, 2x, and x²?

I. x² < 2x < 1/x
II. x² < 1/x < 2x
III. 2x < x² < 1/x

a. None
b. I
c. III
d. I and II
e. I, II, and III
An alternate approach is to determine the CRITICAL POINTS by setting the expressions equal to each other:

1/x = 2x
2x² = 1
x² = 1/2
x = √(1/2) = 1/√2 ≈ 1/1.4 ≈ 10/14 ≈ 5/7.

1/x = x²
x^3 = 1
x = 1.

2x = x²
x=2
(We can divide by x because x>0.)

The critical points are x=5/7, x=1, x=2.
These critical points indicate where two of the expressions are EQUAL.
Thus, to the left and right of each critical point, the value of one expression must be GREATER than the value of another.

To determine which of I, II and II could be true, plug in values to the left and right of each critical point.

5/7 < x < 1:
If x = 3/4, then:
1/x = 4/3.
x² = 9/16.
2x = 3/2.
Since x² < 1/x < 2x, we know that II could be true.
Eliminate A, B and C.

In statement III, 2x<x², which implies that 2<x.
But for 1/x to be the greatest value, x must be a fraction.
Since x cannot at the same time be both a value greater than 2 and a positive fraction less than 1, III is not possible.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:56 pm
A great method to solve this kind of ordering of power problems (or inequalities) is to use graphs. See my post here for a graphical solution of this problem >> https://www.beatthegmat.com/algebra-if-x ... tml#601369
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:57 am
Location: New York & Rotterdam
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:780

by misterholmes » Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:15 am
Hey! this is one of my favourite questions and I love plugin in numbers. It's like suduko on crack. And I like Anjou's graph of these functions in her link.

What hasn't been duly emphasised yet, if I may, is that x is positive, and so you could just divide or multiply by x, without killing yourself on plugins.

For example, (III) 2x<xx<1/x. Looking at the left hand side, dividing out one x gets us to 2<x. Which means the square xx is over 4, and couldn't possibly be smaller than a fraction

Similarly for (II) xx<1/x<2x. L.H.S says xxx<1 so x is between 0 and 1. R.H.S says 1<2xx or xx>1/2 and that's an easy number to find.

Finally (I) xx<2x<1/x. is left for exercise :)

Kind Regards,

Misterholmes
www.gmatdojo.com
Mindfulness, Concentration, Insight

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:07 pm
Location: Rockville, MD

by Edwardsfire » Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:26 am
I agree with Mitch Hunt's approach. Get the pivot points and test a number for x between each segments. The tricky part in the question is "could be correct", that means the choices are not ALWAYS right.