BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Combination problem and a few more.

Expert replies
by torofish » Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:18 am
1.) Kris is purchasing a gear to ride his bike. He wants 2 gloves, 1 parka, 2 hats, 3 boots. A catalog offers 5 types of gloves, 3 parkas, 4 hats, 6 boots. How much different order could he place?
1.) 360
2.) 720
3.) 3600
4.) 7200
5.) 36000

Couldn't do

2.) S is non-negative integers.
So, all possible value = 0, 5, 0.6, -0.7, am I correct?

3.) A, B, C, D are consecutive integers in increasing order.
I thought it could by either 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 13, 15, 17, 19, 21. Both sequences are increasing, and consecutive.
But solution seems to interpret that as 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 only.
Is my 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 correct?
[/url]
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by cameronwu » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:03 pm
Hi. I couldn't really understand what you meant by question 2) and 3)... it seems like you left out information in the question.

I think I can help with Question 1 though.

This is a basic combinations problem that involves figuring out how many combinations you can make of each different gear type, and multiplying them all together. So the basic formula would look like (Combos of Gloves) * (C. of Parks) * (C. of Hats) * (C. of boots) = Answer.

In case you don't know how to do a combination, it looks like this. Take gloves for example. You have 5 types and make 2 choices, so it would be (# of types)! / [(choices)!*(types-choices)!]. 5! / (2!*3!) = 120 / 2*6 = 10. So you have 10 total combinations of gloves to choose from.

Expanding that for the problem, you end up getting (10)*(3)*(6)*(20) = 3600 combinations.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:03 pm
torofish,

please review the posting guidelines: you need to post questions in full with the answer choices.

For your second question:
2.) S is non-negative integers.
So, all possible value = 0, 5, 0.6, -0.7, am I correct?
0 and 5 are non-negative integers. But 0.6 and -0.7 are not non-negative integers because 0.6 isn't an integer and because -0.7 isn't an integer and is negative.
3.) A, B, C, D are consecutive integers in increasing order.
I thought it could by either 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 13, 15, 17, 19, 21. Both sequences are increasing, and consecutive.
But solution seems to interpret that as 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 only.
Is my 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 correct?
13, 15, 17, 19, 21 are NOT consecutive integers; instead, they are consecutive odd integers.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion