gmatnmein2010 wrote:In an August 1, 2002 legal memo that would later become a lightning rod for controversy, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee went on record as one of the first and most senior government officials to consider controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing with so-called unlawful enemy combatants.

A) controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
B) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
C) controversial interrogation tactics as permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
D) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions to be irrelevant in dealing
E) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions as irrelevant in dealing
i usually get stumped on very lengthy SC pls help to deal them

gmatnmein2010 wrote:In an August 1, 2002 legal memo that would later become a lightning rod for controversy, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee went on record as one of the first and most senior government officials to consider controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing with so-called unlawful enemy combatants.

A) controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
B) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
C) controversial interrogation tactics as permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing
D) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions to be irrelevant in dealing
E) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions as irrelevant in dealing
i usually get stumped on very lengthy SC pls help to deal them

gmatnmein2010 wrote:In an August 1, 2002 legal memo that would later become a lightning rod for controversy, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee went on record as one of the first and most senior government officials to consider controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing with so-called unlawful enemy combatants.

A) controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - Awkward

B) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - Correct

C) controversial interrogation tactics as permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - Parallelism error

D) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions to be irrelevant in dealing - Same as C

E) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions as irrelevant in dealing - Same as C

gmatnmein2010 wrote:
In an August 1, 2002 legal memo that would later become a lightning rod for controversy, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee went on record as one of the first and most senior government officials to consider controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing with so-called unlawful enemy combatants.

A) controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - lack of parallelism - to be permissible....should be to be irrelevant...even then it would be wordy . ELIMINATE

B) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - permissible and irrelevant - parallel - CORRECT

C) controversial interrogation tactics as permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing - as permissible .....irrelevant ...lack of parallelism .... ELIMINATE

D) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions to be irrelevant
in dealing - permissible ...to be irrelevant...lack of parallelism..ELIMINATE

E) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions as irrelevant in dealing - permissible ...as irrelevant...lack of parallelism...ELIMINATE

i usually get stumped on very lengthy SC pls help to deal them - GMAT just tries to confuse you .that is its sole intention...u r allowing them to do so. Kill it