Milovan wrote:
So, my question is why we took 0.68 and not 0.54 to subtract from 1 since in that case we would get higher probability? That means of course that we need to change starting assumption that rise of the stock with probability of 0.68 directly depends from the rise of the stock with probability 0.54.
Thanks
Strategy:
To MINIMIZE the probability that either A or B happens, make one of the probabilities DEPENDENT on the other.
In other words:
One event will be INDEPENDENT: it can happen ON ITS OWN.
The other event will be DEPENDENT: it can happen only if the first event happens.
Since the first event can happen on its own, it's EASIER for the first event to happen.
Thus, it must have the GREATER probability.
Since the second event depends on the first event, it's HARDER for the second event to happen.
Thus, it must have the SMALLER probability.
Applying this reasoning to the problem above:
The first event -- the INDEPENDENT probability -- must be Stock B, with a probability of 0.68.
The second event -- the DEPENDENT probability -- must be Stock A, with a probability of 0.54.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at
[email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3