BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS- Walter Zachary age problem

Expert replies
by anticipation » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:20 am
What is WalterÂ’s age now?

(1) WalterÂ’s brother Zachary is now twice as old as Walter was
exactly fiÂ…ve years ago.

(2) The positive difference between WalterÂ’s and ZacharyÂ’s
ages is less than three.

[spoiler]OA:E

Some how not convinced with OA as it can be solved using both the equations.
1)z=2(w-5)
also known w>z

2) |w-z|<3
i.e w-z=1 or w-z=2 or w-z=0 (only taking 3 possibilities since we already know w>z)
by taking w-z=1, we know w=9 , z=8 which satisfies equation 1

So I feel it should be C. Any inputs to correct me if I'm wrong would be great.
[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kvcpk » Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:41 am
anticipation wrote:What is WalterÂ’s age now?

(1) WalterÂ’s brother Zachary is now twice as old as Walter was
exactly fiÂ…ve years ago.

(2) The positive difference between WalterÂ’s and ZacharyÂ’s
ages is less than three.

[spoiler]OA:E

Some how not convinced with OA as it can be solved using both the equations.
1)z=2(w-5)
also known w>z

2) |w-z|<3
i.e w-z=1 or w-z=2 or w-z=0 (only taking 3 possibilities since we already know w>z)
by taking w-z=1, we know w=9 , z=8 which satisfies equation 1

So I feel it should be C. Any inputs to correct me if I'm wrong would be great.
[/spoiler]
YOu were right till the end. Why did u leave out w-z=2??
w-z cannot be 0 if w>z
Hence w-z can be either 1 or 2. [Assuming only integer ages are possible. I am not sure of it]

Even in case of integer ages, w-z=1 or w-z=2
when w-z =1, w=9,z=8 is possible
when w-z=2, w=8, z=6 is possible.
2 idfferent values for W.

hence INSUFF

pick E.

Hope this helps!!
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:29 am
Just in case you wanted to see it alebraically; z=zachary w=walter

1) z=2(w-5)
We don't know z or w, so (1) is insufficient.

2) w-z<3
We don't know z or w, so (2) is insufficient.

(1) and (2), tell us;

w-[2(5-w)]<3
w-(10-2w)<3
w-10+2w<3
3w<13
w<(13/3)

Thus, 0<w<13/3, we cannot say for sure hold old Walter is. Thus E, none together or alone is sufficient.


Hope this helps.

THanks,

Jared
Join the discussion