BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine home land

Expert replies
by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:03 am
His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine home land, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.

(A) in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas
(B) in which great ice sheets existed in what are now temperate areas
(C) when great ice sheets existed where there were areas now temperate
(D) when great ice sheets had existed in current temperate areas
(E) when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate


OA: B

Experts - can you please share your analysis. I'm stuck between B & E - need solid reasoning to eliminate the wrong choice and accept the right one.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Spencer@Prep4GMAT » Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:38 am
Sure, RBBmba@2014!

His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine home land, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age in which great ice sheets had existed in now currently temperate areas.

(A) Incorrect. The past perfect had existed is incorrect. We use past perfect to describe a past event that preceded another event in the past. Use the simple past existed instead. Also, now and currently are redundant -- we don't need both.
(B) Correct. The simple past existed is correctly used.
(C) Incorrect. The relative clause where there were areas now temperate is awkward. The ice sheets existed in certain areas; now it sounds as if the ice sheets are in a location along with other areas.
(D) Incorrect. The past perfect is incorrect. Also, the contrast between the areas as being temperate now, though they were not long ago, is no longer clear.
(E) Incorrect. The placement of now after existed in areas makes it sound as if the ice sheets existed (past)...now (present), which of course doesn't make sense. Now needs to be close to are temperate to make it clear that it modifies are temperate.

In general, adverbs and other modifiers should be as close as possible to the thing they modify in order to avoid confusion.

Let me know if I can clear up anything else!
Ready4
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:10 pm
Hi Spencer - thanks for your reply.

A quick clarification on B - the intended meaning of this correct option is great ice sheets existed in areas that are now temperate. Right ?

Then isn't the fragment "existed in what are now temperate areas" given in the correct option bit awkward ? Shouldn't the term 'areas' come immediately following the preposition 'in'?
Join the discussion

by Spencer@Prep4GMAT » Thu Mar 26, 2015 6:13 am
RMMmba@2014,

The way you phrased it is also correct. In fact, the two construction are grammatically equivalent. In Answer (B), what is a relative pronoun that stands for "areas":

...existed in what are now temperate areas.
...existed in areas that are now temperate areas.

Using what as a pronoun is not uncommon. For example:
I like what you're wearing today.
I like the clothing that you're wearing today.
I like what you're wearing today (for clothing).

So both options are correct, even if we may be more accustomed to hearing one.

Keep in mind that the correct option is not necessarily the most ideal (the way we think it should be said), and sometimes it can even sound a bit odd. But in such cases the correct answer will still be grammatically correct, and the other four choices will have clear grammatical errors.

Appreciate the follow-up, RBBmba@2014. Let me know if you have any other questions!
Ready4
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1