BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

According to some analysts

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 4 times

According to some analysts

by srisl11 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:29 pm
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.

(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal’s merits, to tax
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing


Please help
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 280
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:18 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by Jatinder » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:38 pm
IMO A


A--makes the restrictive clause right
Other have modifier problems
Keep flying
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:45 pm
i would go with E



have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment

pronoun "have" doesnt go with antecedent "proposal" in A

whats the OA??
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:58 pm
A B C are incorrect because its is a possessive pronoun and hence subject should be proposal's not proposal.

between D and E

D - to tax is wrong, a noun is required

E is correct because "taxing all........, if enacted, have disastrous" is a gerund phrase
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 4 times

by srisl11 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:46 am
OA is A


But I'm really unable to figure out why D is wrong...
Can some one help me with D?

Is it because in A "its merits" refer clearly to "Proposal of tax merits "
Last edited by srisl11 on Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:49 am
What is the source of this q?
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 4 times

by srisl11 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 12:51 am
schumi_gmat wrote:What is the source of this q?
1000 SC # 48
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:00 am
srisl11 wrote:OA is A


But I'm really unable to figure out why D is wrong...
Can some one help me with D?

Is it because in A "its merits" refer clearly to "Proposal of tax merits "
only a proposal can be enacted. taxing cant be enacted. so the proposal will have to be the subject.
only A and B have this. B is wordier, shorter is better. hence A
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 4 times

by srisl11 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:17 am
scoobydooby wrote:
srisl11 wrote:OA is A


But I'm really unable to figure out why D is wrong...
Can some one help me with D?

Is it because in A "its merits" refer clearly to "Proposal of tax merits "
only a proposal can be enacted. taxing cant be enacted. so the proposal will have to be the subject.
only A and B have this. B is wordier, shorter is better. hence A
Thank you very much for the explanation,,,,
:)
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:06 am

by Caroline Lee » Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:21 am
raunekk wrote:i would go with E



have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment

pronoun "have" doesnt go with antecedent "proposal" in A

whats the OA??
The verb is " would ... have", not "have" alone.
Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. ----Russell
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:09 pm

by Kusumita » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am
B should be the answer..
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:12 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by OGMATTERS » Fri Nov 20, 2009 6:33 pm
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.

(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal's merits, to tax
(E) the proposal's merits are, taxing

In A, "its merits" is touching "the proposal" making it clear what it refers to.

I believe the correct idiom is: "propose to" therefore eliminating B.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:57 am
I do not see any similar question in OG. we should focus on OG. However I try

check grammar. No grammar error

check meaning, style

gmat do not want "to do", "doing" to be subject. there is one case gmat permit is "to do is to do"

a and b are left.

I think idioms are "whatever its merit" , "propose to tax". I am not sure of this. help .pls
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by ok24by7 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:38 pm
Ans is E.

Antecendent to the possesive pronoun -its- must exist.

So A is wrong and E is right.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:24 am
srisl11 wrote:According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.

(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal�s merits, to tax
(E) the proposal�s merits are, taxing


Please help
A is perfect here.

C, D and E are changing (completely) the intended meaning of the sentence.
Subject of the main clause, as per the original meaning, is THE PROPOSAL, not the "taxing" or "to tax".

In B, subject is retained, but meaning is not. MAY BE does not convey the intended meaning.

Good question though!!!
Top
Post new topic Locked