BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Interesting GMATFix Problem-31

Expert replies
by arora007 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:25 am
Image
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by fatalityish » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:21 pm
The method of solving is pretty simple for this one but i am not sure about the answer.

Soln:-

let eqn of line l be

y=mx+c where m-> slope and c-> y intercept

from given data
eqn is y=(5/4)x + c
since the line passes through (8,0), putting this value in the eqn of line l we get
0=(5/4)*8 +c
c=-10

hence eqn of l => y=(5/4)x-10

now line k meets l at (4,y').
put this value in eqn of l
y'=(5/4)*4 -10
y'=-5
hence point of intersection is (4,-5)

also y intercept of line k is (0,-3)
then using the equation:-
m=(y"-y')/(x"-x')

we get
m=(-5-(-3))/(4-0)
m=-(1/2)

hence eqn of line k is
k=> y=-(1/2)x-3


we have the two equations as
l=> y = (5/4)x - 10
k=> y = -(1/2)x - 3

the shaded region can be taken as all the values of y which are lesser than (5/4)x-10 and greater than -(1/2)x-3.

to verify this one can put a random value for x or y in any one of the equation and check.

eg:- x = 12 in eqn for l
we get y = 5
the shaded region will have all the values of y less than 5.

hence we get the solution as
-(1/2)x-3 < y < (5/4)x-10

we cannot have an equality with the line as there are points on the line which do not come under the shaded region. for eg (0,-3) lies on line k but not in the region and (0,-10) lies on the line l but not in the region.
arora please verify the options for this question.

Ishaan
Practice makes does a man perfect, but a planned practice takes the man beyond perfection!!!
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:13 pm
the shaded region can be taken as all the values of y which are lesser than (5/4)x-10 and greater than -(1/2)x-3.
I was unruffled by this step... somehow found it tough!
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by fatalityish » Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:44 am
arora007 wrote:
the shaded region can be taken as all the values of y which are lesser than (5/4)x-10 and greater than -(1/2)x-3.
I was unruffled by this step... somehow found it tough!
arora i hope u got the solution until the 2 equations.
Further to that:
Consider line l, there are two regions, one above it (where (0,0) lies) and one below it. Similarly for line k there are two regions, above and below.

Now the requirement in our question is to find out the equation for the shaded region, so we can very well establish one fact that the required region is the common part of area below line l and above line k.

now consider any particular point which you know will lie below line l. for instance (8,-1) does not lie on line l and is below it.
put this value in the equation for line l (y=(5/4)x-10).
we will get
L.H.S. =-1
R.H.S. = (5/4)*8-10 = 0
hence L.H.S < R.H.S.
this means that the equation
y<(5/4)x-10 represents the area below line l.

similarly for line k we can find out the equation for the region above line k. Try with point (0,0).

so we get the required solution.
But i still have the confusion if the equality should be there or not, because there are points in line l and in line k which can never come in the shaded region hence no equality.

Ishaan
Practice makes does a man perfect, but a planned practice takes the man beyond perfection!!!
Join the discussion