BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Kaplan 800

Expert replies
by erjamit » Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:47 am
To tackle the issue of Congressional campaign spending is [i][i]becoming embroiled in a war which is raging between those who support public financing with[/i][/i] those who would lift the limits on the amount political parties and individuals may donate.

A. becoming embroiled in a war which is raging between those who support public financing with
B. becoming embroiled in a war raging among those who support public financing with
C. to become embroiled in a war raging betweer those who support public financing and
D. to become embroiled in a war which is raging among those who support public financing and
E. becoming embroiled in a war raging between those who support public financing and


OA will follow...lets have some opinions...[/u]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by loki.gmat » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:09 am
only C makes some sense to me.



Thanks!
Join the discussion

by sulabh » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:29 am
Betwen x and y is the correct idiom so eliminate A,D& B.
Between C & E, C is parallel To tackle the issue .......to become embroiled.
Hence the answer is C.
750(Q50,V40)
Join the discussion

by erjamit » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:33 am
OA is C, but I have one doubt here, this sentence has two parallels...

To tackle the issue .......to become embroiled
betweer those who support public financing and those who would ....

I have never seen two parallels in a sentence before, is it ok to have the above structure.
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:54 am
Yep, Its perfectly alright to have two parallel pieces in the sentence.

First one is parallelism needed by to

Second one is parallelism needed by and
Please do not post answer along with the Question you post/ask

Let people discuss the Questions with out seeing answers.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1