BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Good one...

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times
by girish3131 » Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:41 am
The administration has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their campaign to protect miners.


has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
have increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
has increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
have increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of their

[spoiler]
my ques is Author might intend to say that like initially fine was 100 $ but now it became 200 $. In this scenario we can use AMOUNT too.... Plz comment....[/spoiler] will post OA after few comments....

ta
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:54 am
Since 'the admininstration ' is used so 'has ' should be used , so A, C and D remain
A is out as it uses 'their' , as singular entity must be used instead

Between C and D , D is out as 'amount of fines' seems to be wrong. 'amount of fine' is ok to use but when you 'number of fines' its appropriate as 'fines' itself denotes it can be counted and hence cant be used along with amount . You can however use ''amount of money 'as money cant be counted .

But you cant use 'amount of xxx' where xxx is sth which is countable and 'fines' mean its beng treated as a countable entity.

So C IMO
Last edited by rohan_vus on Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 amFollowed by: 6 members
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:06 am
girish3131 wrote:The administration has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their campaign to protect miners.


has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
have increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
has increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
have increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of their

[spoiler]
my ques is Author might intend to say that like initially fine was 100 $ but now it became 200 $. In this scenario we can use AMOUNT too.... Plz comment....[/spoiler] will post OA after few comments....

ta
Now, you are right,amount can be used but grammatically "amount of fines" is not correct-->"number of fines" seems more suited.
The author means to say"suppose initially 3 fines were there. No fine was imposed you dont wear the gloves but fines were there:-
1)If you dont wear the helmet
2)If you dont wear the safety boots
3)If you dont wear safety goggles

Now we ahve a 4th fine -If you dont wear gloves

So like this maybe number of fines has increased.

Well,this is my point of view.
If someone differs frm me,I would really like to hear their POV.

Any experts out there!!!




Also,can you post the OA plz!!
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1132
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 amFollowed by: 6 members
Location: India
Thanked: 64 times
GMAT Score:760

by harsh.champ » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:07 am
rohan_vus wrote:Since 'the admininstration ' is used so 'has ' should be used , so A, C and D remain
A is out as it uses 'their' , as singular entity must be used instead

Between C and D , D is out as 'amount of fines' seems to be wrong. 'amount of fine' is ok to use but when you 'number of fines' its appropriate as 'fines' itself denotes it can be counted and hence cant be used along with amount . You can however use 'amount of dollars' or 'amount of money 'as dollars or money cant be counted .

But you cant use 'amount of xxx' where xxx is sth which is countable and 'fines' mean its beng treated as a countable entity.

So C IMO
Well,I didn't get ur explanation over there.
Dollars can be counted,I suppose.

Can you provide a brief explanation??
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:18 am
Thanked: 2 times

by girish3131 » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:17 am
Harsh

i think u haven't reat my ques...

i knw that there may b no. of fines . in that case of course u can say like .... number of fines...

BUT take this scenario ->

it is also possible that There is only one fine , whose amount has been increased... like earlier if somebody does electricity theft then fine was 100$ , which now has been increased to 200 $. So we can say like amount of fine of electricity theft has been increased.

wat u say...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 21 times

by rohan_vus » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:26 am
harsh.champ wrote:
rohan_vus wrote:Since 'the admininstration ' is used so 'has ' should be used , so A, C and D remain
A is out as it uses 'their' , as singular entity must be used instead

Between C and D , D is out as 'amount of fines' seems to be wrong. 'amount of fine' is ok to use but when you 'number of fines' its appropriate as 'fines' itself denotes it can be counted and hence cant be used along with amount . You can however use 'amount of dollars' or 'amount of money 'as dollars or money cant be counted .

But you cant use 'amount of xxx' where xxx is sth which is countable and 'fines' mean its beng treated as a countable entity.

So C IMO
Well,I didn't get ur explanation over there.
Dollars can be counted,I suppose.

Can you provide a brief explanation??
Yep . dollars is countable .Typo, edited original post
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:27 am
Thanked: 2 times

by yeahdisk » Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:42 am
yes - 'amount' is different to 'number', therefore any sentence containing 'amount' is changing the original intent of the questions and can be discounted.

IMO C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 68 times
GMAT Score:680

by harshavardhanc » Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:00 am
girish3131 wrote:

my ques is Author might intend to say that like initially fine was 100 $ but now it became 200 $. In this scenario we can use AMOUNT too.... Plz comment... will post OA after few comments....
In that case the author would use increased the amount of fine ... or increased the amount of the fines.............
Regards,
Harsha
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pmFollowed by: 21 members
Thanked: 99 times

by vk_vinayak » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:00 am
I think C is correct. D seems to alter the meaning of the sentence.
What is the OA ?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 47 times

by kstv » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:45 am
The administration has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their campaign to protect miners.
has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
have increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of their
has increased the number of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
has increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of its
have increased the amount of fines for mining safety violations as part of their

Adiminstration is singular so the verb has is appropiate . Rule out B and E. their intending to refer to admin. is plural . singular its is correct. Eliminate A.
the amount of fine could make some sense but not amount of fines So C is the best option.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:55 am
Thanked: 6 times

by VikingWarrior » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:43 am
My answer is C
Why not D?
increasing amount of fines = increasing fines
increasing the number of fines means increasing the number of things that one can be fined for
D changes meaning
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1