-
coolgirl26
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:24 pm
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
for every integer k..perplexing?
Source: Beat The GMAT — Problem Solving |
The problem is about a geometrical progression. Because the explanation would have been hard to write without an equation editor, please see picture.
- Attachments
-
The above answer is absolutely correct, but geometric sums can be tricky, especially if you don't know the proper formulae. Attempting to derive the about result in two minutes would be fairly difficult.
Since the solutions do not require a specific answer, estimation is your best friend here. The sequence is 1/2 - 1/4 + 1/8 - 1/16 + 1/32... Each term becomes exponentially less relevant to the total.
After computing the sum of the first three terms (3/8), it should be clear that no single term after it is going to bring this sum below 2/8 or above 4/8, for obvious reasons. So you can pretty safely choose the correct answer.
Since the solutions do not require a specific answer, estimation is your best friend here. The sequence is 1/2 - 1/4 + 1/8 - 1/16 + 1/32... Each term becomes exponentially less relevant to the total.
After computing the sum of the first three terms (3/8), it should be clear that no single term after it is going to bring this sum below 2/8 or above 4/8, for obvious reasons. So you can pretty safely choose the correct answer.
I tutor GMAT/GRE level mathematics privately in the Los Angeles region, as well as via Skype for a discounted rate. Send me a message if you're interested.
















