BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolution!

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by thephoenix » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:19 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:If x, y, and z are nonzero numbers, is (x)(y + z) > 0?

(1) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

(2) |z + y| = |y| + |z|

Source : MGMAT CAT
IMO C

we need to prove x(y+z)>0----->x(y+z)=+ve number
it can happen if bth x and (y+z) are +ve or >0 OR bth x and (y+z) are -ve or <0 at same point of time
s1)----->either x and y are +ve or bth -ve-----> if x is >0--->y>0 or else x<0---->y<0
insuff
s2) same if z>0,y>0 or if z<0,y<0
insuff
combining
if x>0--->y>0---->z>0---->prodct>0
if x<0--->y<0---->z<0----->prod>0
hence suff
Last edited by thephoenix on Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:20 am
YEa but how ?

Could you pick #s and explain ?
thephoenix wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:If x, y, and z are nonzero numbers, is (x)(y + z) > 0?

(1) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

(2) |z + y| = |y| + |z|

Source : MGMAT CAT
IMO C
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:29 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:YEa but how ?

Could you pick #s and explain ?
thephoenix wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:If x, y, and z are nonzero numbers, is (x)(y + z) > 0?

(1) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

(2) |z + y| = |y| + |z|

Source : MGMAT CAT
IMO C
just take simple no's x=1 y=2 and z=3
s1)1+2=3 for bth side
but if u take one -ve and one positive value at same point of time then s1 does not holds
say x=-1 and y=2
then LHS=1 and RHS =3
in order to satisfy this statement bth x and y has to be of same sign
same is with s2)
Join the discussion

by suryapal » Sat Apr 03, 2010 10:31 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:If x, y, and z are nonzero numbers, is (x)(y + z) > 0?

(1) |x + y| = |x| + |y|

(2) |z + y| = |y| + |z|

Source : MGMAT CAT

statement 1 : insufficient
according to statement we can conclude that both x and y are of the same sign .. either -ve or +ve i.e if the x and y are of different signs then scondtion given in statement 1 can not be satisfies ( pick some number and try )
but it don't say anything about z , so by taking different values of z ... (x) (y+z) could be greater than or less than zero ( pick some no. and try )
eg.
(2) (3-4) < 0
and
(2) (3+4) >0

similarly statement 2 is insufficient

but both statement states that x,y and z are of same sign .. either -ve or +ve

so if all positive then
(2) (3 +4) > 0

and if all negative
(-2) (-3-4) >0

so taking both statement together answer is always yes...

so the answer is C
Join the discussion