BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Andromeda

Expert replies
by bluementor » Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:07 am
When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970's, it was feared that scientists might inadvertently create an "Andromeda strain," a microbe never before seen on Earth that
might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

A) it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
B )it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it
C )kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
D )kill vast numbers of humans who have no natural defenses against them
E) kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against them
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by aj5105 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:17 am
IMO (B)..
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
The OA to the above is C.

I need to understand the necessity of the word 'would' in the OA. Can someone please explain this?

If one of the answer choice was the following (same as C, but without 'would'), would it be right? why?

kill vast numbers of humans who have no natural defenses against it

Thanks for your help.

BlueMentor
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:06 am
IMO:C
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:22 am
bluementor wrote:When the technique known as gene-splicing was invented in the early 1970's, it was feared that scientists might inadvertently create an "Andromeda strain," a microbe never before seen on Earth that
might escape from the laboratory and it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it.

A) it would kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
B )it might kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against it
C )kill vast numbers of humans who would have no natural defenses against it
D )kill vast numbers of humans who have no natural defenses against them
E) kill vast numbers of humans with no natural defenses against them
Join the discussion

by saketk » Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:08 am
IMO C.
option D and E are easiest to eliminate.. the microbe discussed here is Singular.. and we need it instead of them .

Option B can be eliminated because 'it' has no clear antecedent. Same applies to option A.
Join the discussion

by cbaum » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:36 am
I need to understand the necessity of the word 'would' in the OA. Can someone please explain this?
Without 'would', the sentence implies that the microbe would only kill humans who have no natural defense against it. We want to look for a meaning that implies that ALL humans are at risk, because no human has a natural defense against the microbe.
Join the discussion

by gmatclubmember » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:57 am
'would' justifies the future tense in past.
a lil' Thank note goes a long way :)!!
Join the discussion

by Neo Anderson » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:51 am
this is the case of hypothetical subjunctive! any unlikely event is expressed in this form and 'would' forms the integral part.
answer is indeed c!
Join the discussion

by ollapodrida » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:51 am
would have no defense... suggests that the microbes kill only those who would have no defense after the microbes escape. Without "would", it would be unclear if the microbes kill everyone, including people who had no defense before the microbes came out.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1