-
[email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:02 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:4 members
Hi Tanuj,
What is the source of the question.
Two ANDs in a sentence
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction |
-
sinsofgmat
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:09 am
- Thanked: 1 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
hi mukherjee.tanuj3,
This SC is based primarily on Parallelism and Style rules. It's written in an odd way, but the extra "and" can be justified (I'll get to that in a moment).
1) Style - since this prompt refers to a "list" of things that are done while cattle raising, the phrase "the only thing" makes no sense. There are SEVERAL things. Eliminate D and E.
2) Parallelism - the "3-item" list of tasks must be written in parallel "format." Here, the proper format is "....leave them alone...corral them....drive them..." Eliminate A and B.
Normally, a 3-item list includes one "and" before the 3rd item. Here, the 3 tasks are actually broken into 2 "pieces": "leave them alone while they feed...and then corral them...." which likely refers to something that happens daily and "...and drive them to market when the time is right" which in all likelihood is done just once (per group of cattle). Thus, the extra "and" is used to include another piece to the first piece.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This SC is based primarily on Parallelism and Style rules. It's written in an odd way, but the extra "and" can be justified (I'll get to that in a moment).
1) Style - since this prompt refers to a "list" of things that are done while cattle raising, the phrase "the only thing" makes no sense. There are SEVERAL things. Eliminate D and E.
2) Parallelism - the "3-item" list of tasks must be written in parallel "format." Here, the proper format is "....leave them alone...corral them....drive them..." Eliminate A and B.
Normally, a 3-item list includes one "and" before the 3rd item. Here, the 3 tasks are actually broken into 2 "pieces": "leave them alone while they feed...and then corral them...." which likely refers to something that happens daily and "...and drive them to market when the time is right" which in all likelihood is done just once (per group of cattle). Thus, the extra "and" is used to include another piece to the first piece.
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Last edited by [email protected] on Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
aditya8062
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
i am doubting this question for two reasonsIt is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves, corral them, and to drive them to market when the time is ripe.
(A) all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves, corral them, and to
(B) all one has to do with cattle is to leave them alone to feed themselves, to corral them, and
(C) all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves and then corral them and
(D) the only thing that has to be done with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves, corral them, and
(E) the only thing that has to be done with cattle is to leave them alone while they feed themselves, to corral them, and
firstly the construction : "view of cattle raising" is a wrong construction .prep+ noun +verbing is a wrong construction unless the prep directly refers to the noun ,which is not the case here
secondly how can C be right
C say:all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves and then corral them and
we should be having "to LEAVE them alone" --->why the correct answer has missed that infinitive
kindly tell me if my logic is right
-
[email protected]
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 4:02 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:4 members
-
theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
A = INCORRECT; Leave, Corral and to drive
B = INCORRECT; to Leave, to Corral and Drive
C = CORRECT; Leave & Corral acts as a part of an activity AND Drive is other activity
D = INCORRECT; "only thing" means one thing.. however, there are 3 tasks
E = INCORRECT; "only thing" means one thing.. however, there are 3 tasks
B = INCORRECT; to Leave, to Corral and Drive
C = CORRECT; Leave & Corral acts as a part of an activity AND Drive is other activity
D = INCORRECT; "only thing" means one thing.. however, there are 3 tasks
E = INCORRECT; "only thing" means one thing.. however, there are 3 tasks
R A H U L
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
...an oversimplified view of cattle raising...i am doubting this question for two reasons
firstly the construction : "view of cattle raising" is a wrong construction .prep+ noun +verbing is a wrong construction unless the prep directly refers to the noun ,which is not the case here
secondly how can C be right
A noun can serve as an ADJECTIVE.
Here, cattle serves as an adjective, while raising -- a gerund -- serves as a NOUN.
Thus, the object of of is not the adjective cattle but the noun raising:
an oversimplified view of RAISING.
The purpose of cattle is to indicate the TYPE of raising.
What TYPE of raising?
CATTLE raising.
Analogous structures:
Figure skating --> a TYPE of skating
Money laundering --> a TYPE of laundering
Stock trading --> a TYPE of trading
All one has TO do with cattle is [to] leave them alone.C say:all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves and then corral them and
we should be having "to LEAVE them alone" --->why the correct answer has missed that infinitive
kindly tell me if my logic is right
Here, the to in brackets is implied by the preceding infinitive (to do).
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
aditya8062
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
- Thanked: 46 times
- Followed by:14 members
thanks Gmat guru
i have read that in prep+noun + verbing construction if prep does not refer directly to the noun then the construction is wrong
for this specific reason this sentence is wrong : i've never heard of bees stinging dogs
while this sentence is correct :i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
kindly tell me as what am i missing ?
thanks and regards
but it is precisely for this reason that i had thought that this sentence is not correct .Thus, the object of of is not cattle but raising.
i have read that in prep+noun + verbing construction if prep does not refer directly to the noun then the construction is wrong
for this specific reason this sentence is wrong : i've never heard of bees stinging dogs
while this sentence is correct :i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
kindly tell me as what am i missing ?
thanks and regards
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
I've never heard of bees stinging dogs.aditya8062 wrote:thanks Gmat gurubut it is precisely for this reason that i had thought that this sentence is not correct .Thus, the object of of is not cattle but raising.
i have read that in prep+noun + verbing construction if prep does not refer directly to the noun then the construction is wrong
for this specific reason this sentence is wrong :
while this sentence is correct :i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
kindly tell me as what am i missing ?
thanks and regards
Here, bees serves as a NOUN, while stinging -- a participle -- serves as an ADJECTIVE.
Thus, the object of of is the noun BEES.
Conveyed meaning: I've never heard of BEES.
Intended meaning: I've never heard of THE STINGING OF DOGS (by bees).
Since the intended meaning is not conveyed, the sentence is incorrect.
...an oversimplified view of cattle raising...
Here, cattle serves as an ADJECTIVE, while raising -- a gerund -- serves as a NOUN.
Thus, the object of of is the noun RAISING.
In this case, the intended meaning is conveyed:
an oversimplified view of RAISING.
Please revisit my post above, in which I've clarified the reasoning.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
