BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Sunspot Activity- Weaken

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 16 times
by kanha81 » Tue May 19, 2009 9:31 pm
After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologist will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.

(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

(D) Scientist have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.

(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please explain.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 5 times

Re: Sunspot Activity- Weaken

by vinaynp » Tue May 19, 2009 10:14 pm
kanha81 wrote:After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologist will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.

(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

(D) Scientist have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.

(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please explain.
A), D), and E) are out of scope.

B) is additional information not weakening.

C) It implies that sunspot activity is already being used for weather forecast. Hence, it is possible that new information is already in use for weather forecast. My answer.

OA please.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Tue May 19, 2009 10:51 pm
IMO E

look at the conclusion!

Forecasting would be improved...
but already winds are predictable!
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times

by mehravikas » Tue May 19, 2009 11:22 pm
IMO - E

There is no need to study sunspot to improve the weather patterns because predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Sunspot Activity- Weaken

by thetrystero » Tue May 19, 2009 11:34 pm
kanha81 wrote:After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologist will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.

(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

(D) Scientist have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.

(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please explain.
My choice: I could not find one.

sunspot activity -> wind patterns -> weather patterns.
We know that sunspot activity affects wind patterns somehow and that that somehow affects weather patterns. However, forecasting requires some sense about _how_ the patterns are being affected, and not just that they are. A,B,E all strengthens the argument while D is out of scope. I would probably pick C on the exam since it isn't obviously wrong at first glance, but I'm not quite sure how it fits.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Tue May 19, 2009 11:41 pm
would go for C.

we need to weaken the conclusion that predictions based on sunspot activity will help meteorologists to improve weather forcast

A. out of scope.

B. doesnt weaken

C. either other evidences or sunspot activity can be used equally well to predict weather patterns=>they are substitutes=>sunspot activity based predictions no better=>cant say if weather forecasts can be improved.

D. out of scope. the issue is not why sunspot cycles occur every 11 yrs but whether predictions based on sunpot cycles can improve forecasts

E. out of scope. doesnt talk of sunspot activity based predictions
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Sunspot Activity- Weaken

by thetrystero » Tue May 19, 2009 11:55 pm
thetrystero wrote:
kanha81 wrote:After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologist will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.

(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

(D) Scientist have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.

(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please explain.
My choice: I could not find one.

sunspot activity -> wind patterns -> weather patterns.
We know that sunspot activity affects wind patterns somehow and that that somehow affects weather patterns. However, forecasting requires some sense about _how_ the patterns are being affected, and not just that they are. A,B,E all strengthens the argument while D is out of scope. I would probably pick C on the exam since it isn't obviously wrong at first glance, but I'm not quite sure how it fits.
Read this again and I'm seeing it now. The keyword here is "improve".
If there're currently other methods yielding same or better information than that provided by sunspot data, then this new discovery isn't necessarily a better option. C it is. searching for the wind-weather link totally threw me.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 16 times

Re: Sunspot Activity- Weaken

by kanha81 » Wed May 20, 2009 7:13 am
thetrystero wrote:
kanha81 wrote:After observing the Earth’s weather patterns and the 11-year sunspot cycle of the Sun for 36 years, scientists have found that high levels of sunspot activity precede shifts in wind patterns that affect the Earth’s weather. One can conclude that meteorologist will be able to improve their weather forecasts based on this information.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) Weather forecasts are more detailed today than they were 36 years ago.

(B) Scientists can establish that sunspot activity directly affects the Earth’s weather.

(C) Evidence other than sunspot activity has previously enabled meteorologists to forecast the weather conditions that are predictable on the basis of sunspot activity.

(D) Scientist have not determined why the sunspot activity on the Sun follows an 11-year cycle.

(E) It has been established that predictable wind patterns yield predictable weather patterns.

Please explain.
My choice: I could not find one.

sunspot activity -> wind patterns -> weather patterns.
We know that sunspot activity affects wind patterns somehow and that that somehow affects weather patterns. However, forecasting requires some sense about _how_ the patterns are being affected, and not just that they are. A,B,E all strengthens the argument while D is out of scope.
I went from A to E and crossed out all of them!
thetrystero wrote:I would probably pick C on the exam since it isn't obviously wrong at first glance, but I'm not quite sure how it fits.
I asked the same question, but the OA is [spoiler][C][/spoiler]. So, your guess would have worked. :)
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:28 am

by mason77 » Sun May 15, 2016 2:20 pm
It's pretty clear to be option C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1