BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

smoke

Expert replies

by Testluv » Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:39 pm
Test Luv a quick one on why B is not correct. The argument said that number of people decreased by 3%. But B says that the existing smokers smoke less but this does not prove that the number of people changed.

Do you think my observation is correct?

Vineet

Yes, you are correct. Choice B does not exactly restate evidence. The evidence in the argument is that some quit smoking after the ad campaign while choice B tells us that some among those who continued smoking now smoke less.

The argument is about an explanation for the fact that smoking declined. To strengthen this argument, either you need to find a fact that shores up the explanation or else a fact that rules out alternative explanations.

Choice B does neither. Instead, it establishes alternative reasons for trusting that the phenomenon the author is attempting to explain is truly one that stands in need of an explanation.

In plainer English: smoking really really did go down.

We know from the argumen smoking went down. The author argues that that phenomenon is attributable to X. Again, to strengthen, we need to find a choice that says "yep, it sure was X" or else a choice that says "it wasn't Y".
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:30 pm
Testluv, pls help me out

if conclusion is

the number of smoke persons decline because of advertisement

D said that the number declines not because of tax. so D is strengtherner

I think it is perfect

if conclusion is

advertisement has good effect on smoker

B provides another evidence that advertisement has good effect

B is correct

so, pls, help me out
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:57 pm
B provides another evidence that advertisement has good effect
Not quite; "effect" means result of a cause. Choice B provides another reason supporting the idea that smoking went down AFTER the ad campaign. This is more evidence establishing a chronological correlation between the ad campaign, and then the subsequent decline in smoking. The author had alreadly established this chronological correlation. And, as usual, a mere correlation does not necessarily mean a causal relationship.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:58 pm
The official answer is B. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain
Join the discussion